Hearings to examine the nominations of Michael Payne, of Virginia, to be Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, Alexander Velez-Green, of Virginia, to be a Deputy Under Secretary, and Timothy Dill, of Ohio, and Maurice Todd, of Florida, both to be an Assistant Secretary, all of the Department of Defense.
2025-11-06
Summary
This hearing evaluated nominees for key Department of War positions: Alexander J. Velez-Green for Deputy Under Secretary of War for Policy, Maurice L. Todd for Assistant Secretary of War for Readiness, and Michael D. Payne for Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, along with Timothy D. Dill. The session focused on their qualifications, commitment to national defense strategies, and their adherence to transparency and legal frameworks if confirmed [ 00:07:24-00:07:31 ] [ 00:38:55-00:39:10 ] . Nominees also affirmed their commitment to applicable laws, ethical conduct, and providing timely information to Congress [ 00:08:36 ] .
Themes
"Peace Through Strength" and National Defense Priorities
The nominees underscored a commitment to the President's "peace through strength" doctrine, emphasizing the restoration of peace through military strength and a robust warfighting organization [ 00:07:54-00:07:58 ] . Key priorities highlighted by Mr. Velez-Green included defending the U.S. homeland, strengthening deterrence against China, increasing burden-sharing with allies, and vitalizing the defense industrial base . Dr. Todd emphasized restoring the "warrior ethos" through lethality, meritocracy, and accountability to deter and prevail against threats .
Congressional Engagement and Transparency
Several committee members expressed frustration regarding a perceived lack of consultation and transparency from the Department of War, differentiating it from mere notification [ 00:22:15-00:22:24 ] [ 00:55:20 ] [ 01:24:54 ] . Concerns were raised over the AUKUS review, the National Defense Strategy, the Global Force Posture Review, and communication with allies regarding troop movements . Mr. Velez-Green acknowledged these frustrations and committed to proactive engagement and consultation with Congress if confirmed [ 01:13:19-01:13:25 ] .
Role and Independence of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE)
Michael Payne addressed concerns about CAPE potentially operating beyond its mission and indicated his intent to focus the office on independent analysis . He acknowledged that some legal requirements for CAPE have not yet been implemented [ 00:12:29-00:12:53 ] . Mr. Payne committed to ensuring CAPE provides clear, consistent, and auditable data, streamlines cost reporting, and avoids taking on advocacy roles inconsistent with its advisory function [ 00:39:44-00:40:08 ] [ 00:44:51-00:45:04 ] .
Strategic Focus and Resource Allocation
Discussions highlighted the challenge of balancing homeland defense with global commitments, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. Mr. Velez-Green stated that China remains the pacing threat for force management while also defending the prioritization of homeland defense against narco-terrorism [ 00:30:23-00:30:38 ] . Concerns were raised about resource diversion to South America potentially impacting Indo-Pacific readiness . The importance of U.S. interests in the Middle East and the necessity of NATO allies stepping up for their own defense were also discussed . The strategic significance of the Arctic, particularly for homeland defense and missile defense, was affirmed .
Readiness and Modernization
Dr. Todd outlined his responsibilities to assess total force readiness, enhance data analytics, align military training with national priorities, and protect warfighters through high safety standards . The potential impact of non-reimbursable border missions on readiness was noted . There was a commitment to fully modernize nuclear forces, including NC3 systems [ 00:24:11 ] . Dr. Todd detailed methods for evaluating strategic readiness against China, focusing on data, training, and contingency planning .
Use of Force and Legal Authority
Committee members pressed Mr. Velez-Green on the statutory authority and legal rationale for lethal operations against designated narco-terrorist organizations in the Caribbean and Pacific . Mr. Velez-Green affirmed the President's directive to stop narco-terrorist operations but largely deferred questions on legal specifics to the Office of General Counsel . Senator Kaine expressed significant concern over Mr. Velez-Green's reluctance to confirm involvement in discussions about such strikes or a potential land invasion of Venezuela, interpreting non-denials as affirmations [ 00:58:50-00:58:50 ] .
Tone of the Meeting
The meeting maintained a largely professional, albeit serious, tone. There was notable tension and frustration expressed by several committee members regarding a perceived lack of transparency and communication from the Department of War, particularly concerning policy decisions and information sharing with Congress [ 00:22:15-00:22:24 ] . Mr. Velez-Green's guarded responses, often deferring to other offices or declining to comment on sensitive matters, appeared to exacerbate this frustration among some senators [ 00:57:01-00:57:01 ] . Conversely, some senators voiced support for the nominees and the administration's strategic policy shifts, framing them as a necessary move towards realism in foreign policy [ 01:04:43-01:04:56 ] . The nominees generally committed to improving engagement and working collaboratively with Congress if confirmed [ 01:19:12 ] [ 01:20:03-01:20:04 ] [ 01:20:07 ] .
Participants
Transcript
Sign up for free to see the full transcript
Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.