Business meeting to consider the nominations of Sean McMaster, of Virginia, to be Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, John Busterud, of California, to be Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste, Environmental Protection Agency, and Adam Telle, of Mississippi, to be an Assistant Secretary of the Army, Department of Defense.
Committee on Environment and Public Works
2025-06-11
Summary
This meeting of the committee convened to consider and vote on three presidential nominations: Sean McMaster for Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), John Busterud for Assistant Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and Adam Tell for Assistant Secretary for the Army for Civil Works [ 00:23:49-00:23:58 ] . The Chair, Shelley Moore Capito, expressed confidence in the nominees' qualifications and urged support [ 00:25:09-00:25:28 ] . Ranking Member Sheldon Whitehouse and Senator Alejandro Padilla voiced both support and strong opposition, with particular concerns regarding environmental policy and agency actions impacting states .
Themes
Nominee Approvals and Criticisms
The committee successfully reported all three nominees favorably after roll call votes [ 00:30:00 ] . Chair Capito supported all nominations, highlighting their extensive public and private sector experience [ 00:24:03-00:25:06 ] . Senator Whitehouse supported Adam Tell and Sean McMaster, though his support for McMaster was conditional on the release of critical guidance for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program . However, Senator Whitehouse strongly opposed John Busterud, citing the EPA's alleged "polluter-driven assault on clean air" and describing the agency as a "swamp of corruption" . Senator Padilla voted against all three nominees, attributing his opposition to issues with their respective agencies' actions towards California .
Environmental Policy and Methane Emissions
A significant portion of the discussion focused on environmental policy, particularly methane emissions and the EPA's conduct . Senator Whitehouse criticized the EPA for allegedly blockading authorized funding and becoming a "polluter protection agency" . He also condemned a Republican reconciliation bill that proposed repealing EPA emission standards, expediting permitting, and suspending methane fees, calling the industry's behavior "dishonorable" . Whitehouse issued a stern warning to the fossil fuel industry, stating that their actions on methane emissions would be publicly exposed and lead to future "reckoning" . Senator Curtis briefly associated himself with Whitehouse's comments on methane, offering to collaborate on addressing methane leaks from wells .
California-Specific Concerns
Senator Padilla raised specific concerns regarding federal agencies' treatment of California . He opposed Adam Tell's nomination because the Army Corps had allegedly "zeroed out" funding for critical flood control projects in California, despite congressional authorization . For Sean McMaster, Padilla cited the Department of Transportation's "unlawfully frozen funding" for electric vehicle infrastructure and a "sham investigation" into California's high-speed rail project . Senator Padilla announced a "blanket hold" on all EPA nominees due to the agency's alleged abuse of the Congressional Review Act to undermine California's Clean Air Authority . He demanded accountability from Administrator Zeldin for changing the EPA's long-standing legal position on these waivers .
Tone of the Meeting
The meeting began with a formal and procedural tone, focused on the necessary steps for considering the nominations [ 00:22:56-00:23:43 ] . While Chair Capito maintained a supportive and professional demeanor toward the nominees, the tone quickly shifted as Senator Whitehouse delivered a highly critical and passionate statement regarding the EPA and fossil fuel industry [ 00:25:09-00:25:28 ] . Senator Padilla's remarks further amplified this contentious atmosphere, as he expressed deep disappointment and firm opposition to the nominees based on specific, adverse impacts on California . A brief, lighthearted interjection from Senator Curtis about his grandson provided a momentary respite before the concluding procedural remarks [ 00:33:47 ] . Overall, the tone was a mix of routine legislative process, strong partisan criticism, and firm declarations of dissent and accountability .
Participants
Transcript
Sign up for free to see the full transcript
Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.