Hearings to examine proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of Commerce.

Senate Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies

2025-06-04

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

This hearing of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies convened to consider the President's Fiscal Year 2026 budget request for the Department of Commerce, with Secretary Lutnick as the key witness.[ 00:25:12-00:25:19 ]

Senators expressed concerns about proposed budget cuts and departmental transparency, while the Secretary highlighted the administration's "America First" agenda focusing on economic growth and efficiency.[ 00:26:07-00:26:45 ]

Budget Cuts and Departmental Oversight

Senators raised significant concerns about proposed budget reductions, including a 16.5% cut for the department, a $1.5 billion reduction for NOAA, and potential elimination of the Economic Development Administration.[ 00:26:35-00:26:40 ]

There was strong criticism regarding the lack of detailed FY26 budget justification and the overdue FY25 spend plan.[ 00:26:11-00:26:31 ] Ranking Member Van Hollen highlighted alleged illegal firings of federal employees and the withholding of appropriated funds, citing a federal court ruling against large-scale reorganizations without Congressional partnership.[ 00:29:32-00:29:37 ] [ 00:30:15-00:30:23 ] Secretary Lutnick defended the cuts by emphasizing the elimination of wasteful programs, such as those writing children's books for climate anxiety, and his personal review of all contracts over $100,000 to ensure efficiency and identify fraud or abuse.

National Weather Service (NOAA)

Senators voiced apprehension about staffing shortages at National Weather Service offices, with some locations unable to operate 24/7, particularly in Kansas, Alaska, and Oregon.[ 00:45:19-00:45:19 ]

The Secretary asserted that NOAA is fully staffed with 2,100 meteorologists and ready for hurricane season, committing to protect public safety and forecasting.[ 00:43:51-00:44:07 ] He also promised to modernize outdated technology, including green screens and hard drives, and make the system more efficient.[ 01:50:39-01:51:03 ] Specific concerns were raised about the Seal Rocks Weather Buoy in Alaska being out of commission, impacting maritime safety and commerce.

Trade and Tariffs

Secretary Lutnick highlighted the administration's focus on reshoring manufacturing, citing trillions of dollars in new investment commitments and the goal to narrow the trade deficit. He emphasized using tariffs to ensure fair and reciprocal trade, particularly in industries like aerospace and steel, and to address issues like fentanyl trafficking and currency manipulation. Senators expressed concerns that tariffs could increase costs for small businesses, disrupt supply chains, and harm relationships with allies like Canada. The Secretary clarified that the USMCA agreement ensures tariff-free trade for products made in Canada and the U.S., but other goods would be subject to tariffs.[ 00:38:00-00:38:11 ]

Manufacturing and CHIPS Act Implementation

The Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) program faced scrutiny, with the Secretary describing it as outdated and citing an Inspector General report on waste and abuse.[ 00:48:47-00:49:11 ]

[ 01:07:35-01:07:44 ] Several senators, however, strongly defended the MEP, highlighting its effectiveness in helping small manufacturers with technology adoption and job creation. Regarding the CHIPS Act, the Secretary stated he is renegotiating contracts to secure better value for taxpayers, resulting in increased commitments from chipmakers for the same federal funding.[ 01:39:05-01:39:24 ] [ 01:40:14-01:40:37 ] Concerns were raised about potential delays in funding and discouraging companies by renegotiating deals post-contract.[ 01:39:30-01:39:40 ] [ 01:42:09-01:42:13 ]

Broadband Deployment (BEAD Program)

The Secretary outlined an expedited plan for the BEAD program, aiming for a 90-day application period and all awards disbursed by the end of 2025, emphasizing technologically agnostic and cost-efficient solutions.[ 01:10:58-01:11:21 ]

[ 01:15:00-01:15:01 ] Senators expressed frustration over previous delays and concerns that new rules might force states to restart bidding processes, potentially wasting time and money.[ 01:10:03-01:10:03 ] The Secretary reiterated a commitment to ensure efficient deployment and maximize funding for underserved areas.[ 01:09:34-01:09:41 ] [ 01:12:12-01:12:12 ]

Intellectual Property (USPTO)

Secretary Lutnick noted progress in reducing the backlog of patent applications and removing fraudulent trademarks, highlighting the value of the Patent and Trademark Office. He expressed openness to proposals, such as bipartisan legislation to prevent fee diversion, which historically impacted the USPTO's resources.

The meeting's tone was largely contentious and direct, with senators frequently challenging the Secretary on budget decisions, departmental transparency, and policy impacts. The Secretary remained assertive and defensive, often emphasizing efficiency and the administration's "America First" strategy.[ 00:41:06-00:41:08 ]

While there were moments of strong disagreement, an aspirational collaborative tone emerged, particularly towards the end, with commitments to hold further discussions on specific issues.

Participants

Transcript

Good morning, everyone.  Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies will come to order for its second budget hearing of fiscal year 2026 appropriations process.  This hearing will consider the President's budget request for the Department of Commerce.  I'd like to welcome our witness, Secretary Lutnick.  Glad to see you again.  Thank you for your presence here.  You were easy to corral, and we appreciate that.   Your testimony comes at a pivotal juncture for the department and its agencies.  I look forward to hearing about your priorities and how you plan to achieve them under the president's budget request.  That request is outlined in a brief document transmitted to Congress last month and further clarified in materials published late last week, proposes significant cuts across several agencies within the Department of Commerce.   We need additional information from the department, including the FY26 budget justification and the FY25 spend plan.  This spend plan is required by law and the limited information to date is insufficient.  The budget request proposes a 16.5% reduction in budget authority for the department and its agencies, including a 1.5 billion reduction in the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration.   a $325 million reduction in the National Institute of Standards for Technology, NIST, and the eventual elimination of the Economic Development Administration.  I support the administration's effort to save dollars.  We do need to make certain that these reductions do not harm our efforts to expand manufacturing jobs and to promote Americans' exports abroad.  One of the instances I'd like to highlight is this proposal   suggest the elimination for Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership, a popular NIST program that supports small and medium manufacturing firms in the United States, and certainly in Kansas, despite President Strong's support for American manufacturing.
While NOAA's overall budget is reduced, I'm pleased to see that the budget appendix appears to support maintaining funding and operations for the National Weather Service.  Last Thursday, I visited the   Northwest, I'm sorry, the Weather Forecasting Office in Goodland, Kansas, which I was unable to operate 24-7 since early May.  I appreciate your help, Mr. Secretary, in lifting the nationwide hiring freeze impacting weather forecasting offices, a critical step in restoring normal operations, particularly in Kansas, where it's now tornado season.   We'll also discuss your plans to unwind the BEAD program's burdensome regulations that have stifled domestic investment in broadband deployment.  Secretary Nutnick, thank you for your testimony today.  I look forward to working closely with you and throughout the appropriations process to provide the right level of federal resources to support the Department of Commerce and its agencies.  I now recognize Senator Van Hollen, the ranking member for his opening statement.  Thank you, Mr. Chairman.  Welcome, Mr. Secretary.   I hope that this hearing will be a restart of what had been a strong and professional relationship between this committee, this subcommittee, both sides, and the Department of Commerce.  And I say that because I think that it was the experience of Senator Moran that during the Biden administration, whether they agreed or disagreed, the Department of Commerce was forthcoming.   in providing responses to questions.  And that's also true when you go back to the first Trump administration, right?  But it has been a very different and broken relationship since this administration took office, at least with respect to trying to get answers from this side of the aisle.  I'm not fully aware of all of the chairman's inquiries.   But as you know, we have witnessed during this period of time since the beginning of the Trump administration an unprecedented and, in my view, illegal firing of thousands of federal employees, including many at the Department of Commerce, NOAA, and other places.

Sign up for free to see the full transcript

Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.