Hearings to examine the posture of the Department of the Air Force in review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2026 and the Future Years Defense Program; to be immediately followed by a closed session in SVC-217.

Armed Services Committee

2025-05-20

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

This meeting focused on the current posture and future needs of the Department of the Air Force and the Space Force, highlighting the critical challenges posed by a rapidly evolving global threat environment and the need for significant modernization and sustained investment to maintain national security and technological superiority[ 00:10:59 ]

[ 00:11:18 ] [ 00:12:27 ] . Witnesses provided insights into strategic priorities, budgetary constraints, and efforts to enhance readiness and address emerging threats across air and space domains[ 00:12:00 ] [ 00:12:07 ] .

Themes

Modernization and Readiness Challenges

The United States faces its most dangerous threat environment since World War II, driven by technological advances in areas like AI, hypersonic weapons, and sixth-generation aircraft[ 00:10:59 ]

[ 00:11:18 ] . The Air Force is grappling with unacceptably low mission capability rates for many platforms, including the F-35 fleet, which is available only 54% of the time, posing a significant readiness issue[ 00:13:19 ] [ 00:13:36 ] [ 00:13:43 ] . Efforts are underway to modernize the bomber force, intercontinental ballistic missile force, and advanced battle management systems, alongside the development of the F-47 and collaborative combat aircraft, with a new acquisition approach aimed at greater control and agility to benefit taxpayers and warfighters. Investments are also being made in nuclear modernization programs like Sentinel and the B-21 bomber, which must stay on schedule to deter nuclear threats[ 00:14:12 ] [ 00:14:37 ] . The discussion also touched upon the critical need for more fighter aircraft and improved tanker capacity, noting that many older aircraft are becoming increasingly expensive to maintain and have lower mission-capable rates[ 00:13:02 ] [ 00:54:04 ] [ 00:54:10 ] [ 00:55:17 ] .

Space Force Evolution and Resource Needs

The U.S. Space Force has grown significantly over the past five years and is vital for maintaining space superiority, which is deemed a "no-fail mission". Despite its indispensable role in national security and modern power projection, the Space Force operates with a small fraction of the DoD budget and personnel, and has experienced shrinking resources while taking on new missions and responsibilities, including the space-based technology for the Golden Dome program. There is a clear disconnect between the value provided by the Space Force and the investment it receives, creating risks for the nation. Leadership emphasized the need for more resources to develop comprehensive domain awareness, deploy resilient mission architectures, and build capacity to hold adversary space assets at risk, confirming that they are not adequately funded for these new missions[ 01:26:16 ]

.

Budgetary Constraints and Workforce Challenges

Budget limitations, including the impact of year-long continuing resolutions, have negatively affected recruitment, facility maintenance, and overall readiness for both the Air Force and Space Force. Cuts due to continuing resolutions led to a reduction of nearly half a billion dollars in military personnel accounts, preventing the recruitment of 3,000 potential airmen. Additionally, the facilities sustainment, restoration, and modernization account was decreased by $642 million, impacting the quality of life for airmen. The Department of the Air Force and Space Force also face challenges with civilian workforce reductions, losing skilled personnel who are highly competitive in the job market[ 00:35:27 ]

[ 00:37:02 ] . There is a recognized need to streamline forces by divesting aging systems and unused infrastructure, while investing in platforms and personnel that enhance warfighting capacity.

Strategic Posture and Geopolitical Competition

The strategic landscape has dramatically shifted, with China rapidly modernizing its military to challenge the international order, and other adversaries like Russia and Iran developing cutting-edge systems. The Department of the Air Force's top priority is defending the homeland and deterring China, which influences its fiscal priorities. This involves modernizing nuclear forces, supporting the Golden Dome missile defense program, and investing in personnel readiness and posture within the Indo-Pacific region. The importance of maintaining air power dominance and projecting power globally was underscored, with a focus on both current "fight tonight" capabilities and future advancements.

Tone of the Meeting

The tone of the meeting was largely serious and concerned, reflecting the gravity of the national security challenges discussed[ 00:10:59 ]

[ 00:13:43 ] . There was a clear sense of urgency regarding modernization and readiness, coupled with frustration over budgetary limitations and bureaucratic hurdles like continuing resolutions[ 00:13:02 ] . Speakers often expressed a collaborative spirit, seeking to work with Congress to address critical issues, though some members also conveyed impatience and direct challenges to the witnesses regarding specific delays or policies[ 01:17:13 ] . Concerns about operational security and efficient use of taxpayer dollars were also prominent, occasionally leading to pointed questions[ 00:13:52 ] [ 01:30:43 ] [ 02:14:47 ] .

Participants

Transcript

Good morning.  I begin with a common refrain.  The United States faces its most dangerous threat environment since World War II.   However, though many of our national security challenges mirror the 1930s, warfare looks much different today.  Technological advances in artificial intelligence, hypersonic strike weapons, sixth-generation aircraft, and space-based weapons are transforming the nature of modern conflict.   The Department of the Air Force is on the front lines of these changes.  Today, we will hear from three representatives of that service.  We welcome Secretary Troy Mink, General Chance Saltzman,   and General David Alvin.  I thank all of them for being here and for their continued service to the nation.  The committee understands that the fiscal year 2026 president's budget is not yet complete, and we're therefore aware that the three witnesses before us do not have the full budget picture.  That being said, their testimony is still vital.  It will help us consider how to support the mission of the Air Force and the Space Force, which is to be lethal,   and ready to fight tonight, as the slogan goes.  One of our most pressing responsibilities is to ensure the long-term readiness and modernization of the Air Force.  In the event of war, we need not only capability but also capacity.  If we go to war in 2027,   We will fight with the Air Force we have today, which is a mix of fourth generation fighters, such as the F-15E, F-16, and fifth generation fighters, the F-22 and F-35.  We need more fighter aircraft now.   And we are working, along with our colleagues in the House, Chairman Rogers, to keep the F-15EX line open through our reconciliation bill.
Even as we plan for future systems, we must address the state of today's fleet.  The mission capability rates across many Air Force platforms remains unacceptably low.   Some platform fleets are frequently less than 50% mission capable, and we'll have questions about that.  The F-35 fleet is available a mere 54% of the time.  This is not just a maintenance issue, it is a readiness issue, and it impacts our ability to deter adversaries and respond when necessary.   Taxpayers are investing billions of dollars to support these aircraft, and our airmen and our citizens deserve higher readiness levels to defend our national interest.  I expect our witnesses to provide a frank assessment of what is driving these poor rates, and more importantly, what is being done to reverse the trend.  The Air Force also plays a key role in modernizing our nuclear forces.  The service is responsible for two legs of the nuclear triad, as well as a majority of   of the U.S.  Nuclear Command Control and Communication System.  These programs must stay on schedule to deliver the essential capabilities we need to deter nuclear threats.  We cannot afford to allow these programs to flounder because of a lack of leadership and prioritization.  This committee expects accountability among program managers and transparency with Congress to ensure we can modernize effectively.  And I think this panel shares   that sentiment.  I look forward to hearing our witnesses explain how the Air Force manages these risks while preserving strategic stability.  The U.S.  Space Force has grown significantly in the last five years.  That trend should continue because our threats are growing as well.   Maintaining space superiority is a no-fail mission.  Increased investment in this young service is absolutely vital.  We also must invest in the facilities that support our service members.