Hearings to examine the Department of Energy's atomic energy defense activities and Department of Defense nuclear weapons program in review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2026 and the Future Years Defense Program.

Senate Subcommittee on Strategic Forces

2025-05-20

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

No summary available.

Participants

Transcript

Good morning.  I begin with a common refrain.  The United States faces its most dangerous threat environment since World War II.   However, though many of our national security challenges mirror the 1930s, warfare looks much different today.  Technological advances in artificial intelligence, hypersonic strike weapons, sixth-generation aircraft, and space-based weapons are transforming the nature of modern conflict.   The Department of the Air Force is on the front lines of these changes.  Today, we will hear from three representatives of that service.  We welcome Secretary Troy Mink, General Chance Saltzman,   and General David Alvin.  I thank all of them for being here and for their continued service to the nation.  The committee understands that the fiscal year 2026 president's budget is not yet complete, and we're therefore aware that the three witnesses before us do not have the full budget picture.  That being said, their testimony is still vital.  It will help us consider how to support the mission of the Air Force and the Space Force, which is to be lethal,   and ready to fight tonight, as the slogan goes.  One of our most pressing responsibilities is to ensure the long-term readiness and modernization of the Air Force.  In the event of war, we need not only capability but also capacity.  If we go to war in 2027,   We will fight with the Air Force we have today, which is a mix of fourth generation fighters, such as the F-15E, F-16, and fifth generation fighters, the F-22 and F-35.  We need more fighter aircraft now.   And we are working, along with our colleagues in the House, Chairman Rogers, to keep the F-15EX line open through our reconciliation bill.
Even as we plan for future systems, we must address the state of today's fleet.  The mission capability rates across many Air Force platforms remains unacceptably low.   Some platform fleets are frequently less than 50% mission capable, and we'll have questions about that.  The F-35 fleet is available a mere 54% of the time.  This is not just a maintenance issue, it is a readiness issue, and it impacts our ability to deter adversaries and respond when necessary.   Taxpayers are investing billions of dollars to support these aircraft, and our airmen and our citizens deserve higher readiness levels to defend our national interest.  I expect our witnesses to provide a frank assessment of what is driving these poor rates, and more importantly, what is being done to reverse the trend.  The Air Force also plays a key role in modernizing our nuclear forces.  The service is responsible for two legs of the nuclear triad, as well as a majority of   of the U.S. Nuclear Command Control and Communication System.  These programs must stay on schedule to deliver the essential capabilities we need to deter nuclear threats.  We cannot afford to allow these programs to flounder because of a lack of leadership and prioritization.  This committee expects accountability among program managers and transparency with Congress to ensure we can modernize effectively.  And I think this panel shares   that sentiment.  I look forward to hearing our witnesses explain how the Air Force manages these risks while preserving strategic stability.  The U.S. Space Force has grown significantly in the last five years.  That trend should continue because our threats are growing as well.   Maintaining space superiority is a no-fail mission.  Increased investment in this young service is absolutely vital.  We also must invest in the facilities that support our service members.