Hearings to examine the President's proposed budget request for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of Health and Human Services.

Committee on Education

2025-05-14

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

This meeting of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions convened to discuss the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) fiscal year 2026 budget with Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The session involved a review of the proposed budget, focusing on efficiency, cost-cutting measures, and reforms within the agency, leading to extensive debate on the impact of these changes on various health programs and public services.[ 00:21:32 ]

Themes

HHS Budget, Reforms, and Efficiency

Secretary Kennedy and Senator Paul emphasized the need to reform the federal government and HHS to enhance healthcare affordability and efficiency, aligning with President Trump's mission to "make America healthy again."[ 00:20:34 ] The proposed budget aims to cut costs for taxpayers and achieve "more with less" by reallocating funds from bureaucracy to direct impact initiatives.[ 00:32:45 ]

Senator Sanders acknowledged the systemic issues in the current healthcare system but expressed concern that proposed cuts to critical programs, such as Medicaid and research grants, might be linked to tax breaks for the wealthy. Kennedy defended the budget cuts as essential for streamlining operations, eliminating waste, and increasing accountability, aiming to return spending to pre-COVID levels and improve overall efficiency.[ 00:46:16 ] [ 01:27:09 ] Senator Husted supported efforts to improve services and create savings, underscoring the importance of fiscal responsibility for the nation's future.[ 01:37:24 ]

Vaccine Policy and Public Trust

Senator Murphy challenged Secretary Kennedy on his vaccine policies, alleging that he had contradicted previous statements made during his confirmation and was undermining public trust in vaccines, particularly the measles vaccine. Kennedy countered that his approach involves "radical transparency," where he aims to share all known information about vaccines, attributing public distrust to past misinformation from officials. He also stated that his administration seeks to implement safety studies for vaccines, noting that many have not undergone full placebo trials.[ 01:26:11 ]

Senator Hassan pressed Kennedy to explicitly state that vaccination is the best way to protect children from measles; Kennedy affirmed that it is the best method to stop the spread.[ 01:42:05 ] A factual correction was made regarding some vaccines having been tested against placebo, contrary to Kennedy's earlier assertion.[ 01:41:13 ]

Specific Program Impacts and Concerns

Several senators raised concerns about the effects of budget cuts and "reductions in force" (RIFs) on specific programs. Senators Murray, Collins, Baldwin, Kaine, and Markey cited disruptions in patient care, critical research, and public health services due to these cuts, including impacts on Long COVID research, neurodegenerative disease funding, childhood lead poisoning programs, Head Start, and NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). Kennedy acknowledged the administration's commitment to Long COVID research despite the closure of the COVID office by executive order and defended NIH cuts by targeting administrative bloat, non-essential studies (like DEI and gain-of-function research), and grants to adversarial countries.[ 00:37:37 ]

[ 00:39:33 ] He attributed some program issues to initial mistakes or ongoing consolidation efforts to eliminate redundancies.[ 01:11:15 ] [ 02:26:30 ] Kennedy reiterated the administration's goal to lower prescription drug prices globally and expressed willingness to collaborate on legislative solutions. He announced a comprehensive review of mifepristone, citing new data on adverse health effects, which may lead to changes in its labeling and safety protocols.[ 01:49:58 ] Senator Hawley and Kennedy found common ground on restricting direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising, with Kennedy supporting legislation to remove its tax deductibility.[ 01:51:25 ] Kennedy also discussed efforts to reshore medicine production and reform food additive regulations, aiming to improve public health and reduce chronic diseases.[ 02:35:18 ]

Tone of the Meeting

The tone of the meeting was notably controversial and contentious, marked by several heated exchanges between Secretary Kennedy and various senators, especially concerning the budget cuts, vaccine policies, and the resulting impact on health programs.[ 01:23:01 ]

Many senators expressed skepticism and criticism regarding the Secretary's decisions and their real-world consequences, often questioning his knowledge of specific program details. Secretary Kennedy frequently adopted a defensive posture, emphasizing efficiency, eliminating waste, and the broader vision of the administration, at times attributing negative impacts to "mistakes" or political motivations.[ 00:46:16 ] [ 00:55:28 ] [ 01:11:15 ] [ 02:26:30 ] While some senators supported his goals for efficiency and fiscal responsibility, the meeting also included a brief disruption by audience members, adding to the overall contentious atmosphere.[ 00:30:18 ] [ 00:30:39 ] [ 00:30:59 ] [ 00:31:03 ]

Participants

Transcript

R
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
bureaucratic bloat, regulatory hurdles at the Department of Health and Human Services have made it harder to deliver critical services.  HHS needs to work better for the American people.  This means finding ways to speed up approvals for life-saving drugs,   improving delivery of health care services so Americans who need these benefits can receive them, addressing the high levels of chronic disease, and holding bad actors accountable to lower health care costs for the American people.  I'm encouraged that HHS is already working to address these issues.   I want to note that this is the first time in at least two decades the HHS Secretary is testifying on the Department's budget before the HELP Committee.  And I appreciate Secretary Kennedy for coming to answer our questions on the fiscal year 2026 budget.   Now, people fear change, even when it's from worse to better.  But without a clearly defined plan or objective, people assume the worst.  Much of the conversation about HHS's agenda has been set by anonymous sources in the media and individuals with a bias against the president.   Americans need direct reassurance from the administration and from you, Mr. Secretary, that these reforms will make their lives easier, not harder, and that's why I've invited you.  No one can make that case better than you.  These are the questions about how HHS will be able to preserve its primary functions and duties under this proposed budget.  Many offices and programs potentially seeing changes   are essential for implementing bipartisan laws, including laws championed and signed into law by President Trump.  Example, in 2018, Congress worked with President Trump to pass the Support for Patients and Communities Act, protecting communities, saving lives through increased access to naloxone, and prevention and treatment for fentanyl addiction.   The HELP Committee and President Trump also work together to pass laws to improve research into health disparities, address the needs of Americans with traumatic brain injuries, Alzheimer's, Lyme disease, support family caregivers, and help moms and babies live healthier lives.