Hearings to examine S.222, to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow schools that participate in the school lunch program to serve whole milk.
Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
2025-04-01
Summary
The hearing primarily addressed the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act (S.222) and its potential impact on school nutrition programs and children's health, alongside broader discussions on federal support for child nutrition initiatives.[ 00:19:55 ] Witnesses shared expertise on dietary guidelines, the practical implementation of school meal programs, and concerns regarding funding cuts to essential food security initiatives.[ 00:22:12 ]
Themes
Reintroducing Whole and Reduced-Fat Milk in Schools
The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act, S.222, aims to permit schools to offer whole, reduced, low-fat, and fat-free milk, both flavored and unflavored, enjoying strong bipartisan support.[ 00:19:59 ] Dr. Studi, from USDA, explained that current dietary guidelines recommend most dairy choices be fat-free or low-fat due to widespread overconsumption of saturated fat and calories in the typical American diet, yet acknowledged that whole milk can be part of a healthy diet in an overall context.[ 00:31:55 ] Despite this, she noted that 90% of the U.S. population does not meet dairy recommendations, and consumption has been declining, especially among adolescents.[ 00:30:00 ] Dr. Ayoub, a registered dietitian nutritionist, highlighted that dairy milk contains 13 essential nutrients, including calcium, potassium, and vitamin D, which are often inadequate in children's diets. He argued that the saturated fat in dairy foods, bound in a protein-fat matrix, behaves differently in the body and is not associated with increased cardiometabolic risk or childhood obesity. Krista Byler, a school food service director, presented data from a trial in her district showing a 50% increase in milk consumption and a 95% reduction in milk waste when a variety of milk fat choices, including whole milk, were offered. Many speakers emphasized that offering a choice of milk types could lead to increased consumption and less waste, improving children's nutritional intake and bone health.
Impact of School Nutrition Programs and Potential Funding Cuts
Senators and witnesses underscored the critical role of school meal programs in providing nutritious, balanced meals that support children's health and academic success.[ 00:21:01 ] The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) was lauded for its success in streamlining access to free meals, reducing red tape, and increasing participation. Dan Gorman, a school food service director, reported a 300% increase in breakfast and 30% increase in lunch participation in his district due to CEP, calling it "smart government." However, deep concerns were raised about proposed cuts to nutrition programs, including SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and local food purchase initiatives. Senator Klobuchar warned that cuts to SNAP would directly impact school meals, potentially kicking nearly a million children off child nutrition programs. Lynette Dodson, from the Georgia Department of Education, estimated that raising the CEP threshold could lead to 350 schools and half a million children in Georgia losing access to school meals. Dan Gorman warned that such cuts would "return hunger to the classroom" and harm small agriculture, emphasizing the school meal dollar as "the best dollar that the government spends."
Local Food Programs and Funding
Several speakers expressed dismay over the recent cancellation of local food purchase agreements and farm-to-school programs by the USDA. Senator Klobuchar noted that 56% of funds from these programs went to buying produce, directly contradicting efforts to promote fruit and vegetable consumption. Senator Luján directly challenged the USDA witness on the cancellation of programs like the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program and the Patrick Leahy Farm to School Grant Program, asserting that these programs, crucial for local farmers and schools, had been cut. Dan Gorman recounted his district's success with farm-to-school grants, initiating local food movements and community connections, and expressed disappointment at the cancellation.[ 02:04:40 ] These cancellations were seen as undermining progress in providing fresh, nutritious, locally sourced foods, harming both children's diets and local economies.
Tone of the Meeting
The tone of the meeting was largely earnest and passionate, with a strong bipartisan commitment expressed towards improving child nutrition.[ 00:20:22 ] While there was consensus on the importance of child nutrition, discussions involved a respectful but clear divide on specific dietary guidelines, particularly regarding milk fat content. Concerns over proposed funding cuts to broader nutrition programs elicited strong and emotional objections from several senators, highlighting the human impact of these policies. Witnesses from school districts and nutrition expertise conveyed a sense of dedication and urgency, advocating for practical solutions and adequate support for child feeding programs.
Participants
Transcript
Sign up for free to see the full transcript
Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.