Hearings to examine the nomination of Jamieson Greer, of Maryland, to be United States Trade Representative, with the rank of Ambassador.

Committee on Finance

2025-02-06

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

The hearing covered the nomination of Jameson Greer to be the U.S. Trade Representative, focusing on his qualifications, the future of U.S. trade policy, and the challenges of balancing various economic interests [ 00:31:05-00:31:22 ]

. Senators deliberated on the effectiveness of tariffs, strategies for market access, and the role of the USTR in upholding trade agreements and national security [ 00:32:31-00:32:45 ] .

Themes

Greer's Qualifications and Commitment to Congress

Jameson Greer's nomination was supported by senators who highlighted his extensive experience as Chief of Staff to a former USTR and his integral role in negotiating agreements like the USMCA [ 00:33:06-00:33:26 ]

. He was praised for his understanding of trade policy and his willingness to cooperate with Congress [ 00:33:26-00:33:30 ] . Greer explicitly committed to providing timely and thorough briefings to the committee, sharing proposals before engaging foreign governments, and promptly responding to inquiries from senators [ 00:51:14 ] [ 00:52:33 ] . He also assured the committee that he would always uphold the law [ 01:50:12 ] .

Trade Policy and Tariffs

A central theme was the Trump administration's proposed use of tariffs. Many senators expressed concerns that broad, universal tariffs would harm American consumers, businesses, and specific sectors like tourism and agriculture . Senator Wyden challenged Greer to provide historical precedents for the success of such sweeping tariffs [ 00:54:59-00:55:03 ]

. Greer defended tariffs as a tool to address trade deficits, encourage domestic production, and serve as leverage for market access [ 00:55:38-00:56:16 ] [ 02:07:54-02:08:00 ] . He also indicated that tariffs could be used to address national security concerns, such as fentanyl trafficking [ 01:16:43-01:16:47 ] .

China and Supply Chain Resilience

Senators uniformly voiced strong concerns about China's unfair trade practices, including intellectual property theft and market manipulation [ 01:03:22-01:03:25 ]

. Greer committed to enforcing existing agreements, like the Phase One trade deal, and addressing China's non-compliance . There was significant discussion on the critical need for resilient supply chains, especially for pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and rare earth elements, to reduce dependence on foreign adversaries and strengthen domestic manufacturing [ 02:23:18-02:23:21 ] .

Agricultural Market Access

A key focus was the necessity of opening new global markets for American farmers and ranchers, with senators noting a lack of progress in recent years [ 00:48:09-00:48:15 ]

. Greer acknowledged the strong competitiveness of U.S. agriculture and expressed intent to challenge countries with high tariffs to secure better market access [ 00:49:13-00:49:15 ] . Specific issues raised included Brazil's tariffs on U.S. ethanol and China's unmet commitments for agricultural purchases, which Greer pledged to prioritize .

Role of USTR and Interagency Coordination

Senators emphasized the statutory authority of the USTR as the nation's chief trade negotiator and its direct reporting line to Congress [ 00:31:29-00:31:34 ]

. Concerns were raised about trade decisions being made outside of the USTR's direct purview, as observed with recent tariffs linked to border security . Greer affirmed that the President's emphasis on trade necessitates close coordination among all cabinet members, and he expects to collaborate with departments such as Commerce and Treasury .

Tone of the Meeting

The meeting maintained a professional and respectful tone, despite deep policy divisions on trade strategy [ 00:37:09-00:37:17 ]

. While some senators strongly endorsed Greer's nomination and the President's trade agenda, emphasizing the need for robust action [ 00:40:14-00:40:40 ] , others expressed significant skepticism about the broad use of tariffs and their potential negative economic impacts . The overall atmosphere highlighted the critical and complex nature of the USTR role, reflecting the wide range of interests that trade policy must navigate .

Participants

Transcript

M
Mike Crapo
The committee will return to order.  Senator Wyden and I will give our introductory statements, and then we will go to a good friend and colleague, Senator Hagerty, and then we will go ahead with our testimony, Mr. Greer, for your hearing.   Mr. Greer, I would welcome you and congratulate you on your nomination.  By traditional timelines, this is one of the earliest dates the Finance Committee has held a nomination hearing for the USTR.  Your cooperation and timely responses to questions from both sides of the aisle expedited the Committee's very demanding process.  Mr. Greer is nominated by the President for an incredibly important job.   America's chief trade negotiator.  By statute, and frankly in accordance with our Constitution, our negotiator must report to Congress, which means he reports to the Finance Committee.  This week attention fell on President Trump's executive orders to help secure our borders from illegal immigration and fentanyl smuggling.  I strongly support securing our borders and fighting fentanyl trafficking.   The executive orders rely on International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEPA, and concern drug policy and border security.  The President, not the USTR, invokes IEPA.  And the Department of Homeland Security, not the USTR, is responsible for securing our borders.   Nonetheless, I am securing briefings on these orders and, in fact, Customs and Border Protection will brief the Committee on this matter today.  What the President has done that is different, though, is to bring tariffs into the discussion about border security.   USTR is, as I said, America's chief trade negotiator.  Anytime the U.S.  government is considering tariffs or something that implicates trade policy, he, the USTR, should be a part of those conversations and should report to us about those conversations and solicit our input.
M
Mike Crapo
Right now, Mr. Greer is not in the government and not privy to various discussions.  Confirming him will allow him to be a part of those conversations and to work with this committee, ensuring that Congress fulfills its constitutional responsibilities over international trade.   When we look at whether Jameson Greer will be a good negotiator for America's trade interests and a partner to this committee, his experience and skill set indicate the answer is yes.  He understands the USTR's policymaking since he served as its chief of staff.  At USTR, he distinguished himself as an effective negotiator in his work on the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which overwhelmingly passed Congress.   As many of my Democrat colleagues know firsthand, he worked closely with them on their priorities for USMCA.  As an accomplished international trade attorney, he is an expert on our trade agreements and trade laws, including the requirements to report to Congress promptly and thoroughly.  We need an effective USTER now more than ever.   Frankly, our last USTR did not negotiate any agreements, and we lost ground to foreign competitors.  The Biden administration walked away even from its own limited initiatives, such as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework.   Rather than forge new rules to combat China's trade practices, the prior administration turned its back on existing rules and positions, such as our intellectual property rights under the WTO TRIPS agreement and support for open data flows and non-discrimination against our technology companies.   The Biden administration also dawdled on enforcement of our existing trade agreements, including by failing to act against protectionist measures on our U.S.  agriculture and energy producers.  Finally, there was one other major USTR failure during the last administration.