Spies, Lies, and Mismanagement: Examining the U.S. Agency for Global Media’s Downfall

Committee on Foreign Affairs

2025-06-25

Loading video...

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

This hearing focused on the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), with particular attention to the reforms initiated by Senior Advisor Kari Lake under the Trump administration, drawing sharp divisions between members on the agency's effectiveness, historical mission, and future direction. The discussion encompassed allegations of mismanagement and foreign influence within USAGM, the impact of proposed changes on American soft power, and the transparency of the reform process itself [ 00:00:52-00:00:55 ] [ 00:06:27-00:06:31 ]

.

Themes

USAGM's State and Reform Efforts

Senior Advisor Kari Lake asserted that USAGM is "incompetent and mismanaged and deeply corrupt, politically biased, and frankly, a serious threat to our national security" . She detailed efforts to "rightsize" the agency to its statutory minimum, citing President Trump's executive order as the mandate for these actions [ 01:22:13 ]

. Republicans largely supported these reforms, viewing them as necessary to address systemic problems, security lapses, and weak editorial oversight [ 00:16:25 ] [ 00:16:53 ] . Conversely, Democrats argued that dismantling USAGM weakens American influence and plays into the hands of adversaries [ 00:06:27-00:06:29 ] .

Effectiveness and Reach of USAGM

There was significant debate regarding USAGM's historical and current effectiveness. Democrats highlighted USAGM's role in countering propaganda during the Cold War and its extensive reach, noting record audiences for Voice of America (VOA) Persian service . They questioned why reforms would cut vital services, especially during international crises [ 00:31:47 ]

. Lake, however, stated that VOA programming is often "painful to watch" and that traditional broadcasting methods are outdated in the digital age [ 01:00:58 ] [ 01:04:32 ] . She suggested that newer technologies like Starlink and social media are more effective for information dissemination [ 01:01:58 ] .

Security Lapses and Foreign Influence

Lake alleged that USAGM has "shockingly high number of foreign nationals" and "subpar security vetting," leading to individuals from hostile countries gaining security access with falsified documents . She claimed that 500 such individuals were unaccounted for, and that some grantees, like Radio Free Europe, nearly hired foreign spies . These concerns were echoed by Republican members, who viewed them as a national security risk and a reason for drastic reform [ 00:16:53 ]

. Democrats questioned the evidence and methodology behind these claims, asking for documentation of Lake's review process .

Financial Mismanagement and Accountability

Lake presented several instances of alleged financial mismanagement, including $75,000 for a COVID study, $100,000 to sponsor an Afghan cricket team, and millions in questionable contracts . She criticized the lack of transparency from grantees regarding their spending, alleging that they "stonewalled" audits until the eve of the hearing [ 01:15:33 ]

. A $250 million lease for a "lavish building" that was not equipped for broadcasting was also cited as an example of wasteful spending [ 02:12:13 ] [ 02:12:42 ] . Republicans supported the efforts to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and to root out waste [ 02:15:05-02:15:09 ] .

Impact of Reforms on Soft Power

A major point of contention was whether Lake's reforms would enhance or undermine U.S. soft power. Democrats argued that cutting programs and staff, especially in critical languages like Armenian, leaves a "vacuum" for adversaries like China and Russia to fill with their propaganda [ 00:57:53 ]

. They cited Chinese and Russian state media celebrating USAGM's "dismantling" as evidence of negative impact . Republicans, however, believed that eliminating anti-American bias and foreign influence within USAGM would strengthen America's message [ 01:30:01 ] .

Editorial Independence vs. Government Control

Lake pointed out an "editorial firewall" that she claims prevents management from correcting bias or controlling content, while simultaneously alleging that Chinese embassy officials influenced VOA's Mandarin service content [ 00:28:37 ]

. This led to questions about whether VOA's content truly reflected American interests or was susceptible to foreign manipulation [ 01:17:50 ] . Democrats emphasized the importance of editorial independence for credibility , while Republicans sought more control to ensure pro-American messaging .

Tone of the Meeting

The tone of the meeting was highly contentious and confrontational, especially between Ms. Lake and Democratic members [ 00:01:31 ] [ 00:23:27 ]

. Democrats frequently challenged Ms. Lake's credibility, citing her past political statements and legal disputes, and accused her of undermining American democracy and soft power . Republican members, on the other hand, strongly defended Ms. Lake's actions, commending her for "patriotic work" and efforts to address corruption and anti-American sentiment within USAGM [ 00:16:18 ] [ 00:16:25 ] . The exchanges were often personal, marked by accusations of misrepresentation, a lack of transparency, and the echoing of adversary propaganda .

Participants

Transcript

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.  Ms.  Lake, I thank you for joining us today.   First, I'd like to address President Trump's recent strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, an action taken without consulting the committee or securing congressional authorization.  And it's troubling that Secretary Rubio is not sitting here today and that Republican members are avoiding oversight on such grave matters of war and peace that fall squarely on this committee's jurisdiction.   Instead, as this hearings title shows, we're returning to House Republicans' fixation on far-fetched conspiracies, this time to tear down the U.S.  Agency for Global Media and the important work it supports.  This tracks with President Trump's broad record of denigrating federal agencies and appointing leaders that, far from shepherding their agencies to success, are stewards of their sabotage.   And I believe, Miss Lake, you fall into this category.  The story of the United States Agency for Global Media began with the Voice of America countering Nazi propaganda.  That mission endured through the Cold War and continues today.  USA GM is mandated to reach heavily censored countries with trusted information because Congress recognized that factual reporting contributes to international peace and stability.   And it's in the interest of the United States of America.  The irony that USA GM is now being undone under a banner of disinformation is not lost on me.  Worst, some Republicans wanted to be transformed into every propaganda machine we oppose abroad.   The Trump administration's shortsighted dismantling of USA GM echoes its attacks on the US Agency for International Development, spinning false narratives about corruption and waste to dismantle effective institutions Congress established with bipartisan support.
Miss Lake, if it was your goal at USA GM to use falsehood to advance an agenda, I believe then you're qualified for this job.   Your opening statement, as I read, is full of false narratives.  Aided by Republicans on this committee who still refused to release their own investigation transcripts.  So, Mr Chairman, if your findings are solid, release those transcripts now.  The taxpayers who funded this work deserve transparency, not cherry picked quotes that suit your sham narrative.  And again, I ask that the transcripts all of them.   be made publicly so that the public can read and see everything, not cherry-picked sentences.  Before II was fed into the woodchipper, USAGM and its broadcasters were reaching a record 427 million people weekly, delivering objective news to China, Iran, Russia, and other repressive states.   Last year, VOA's Persian service recorded 223 million visits to its website, doubling over four years.  It had 9.8 million social media followers and 1.8 billion Instagram views.  Then, Miss Lake, you put VOA Persian on leave in March, scrambled to restore it in June when war erupted, and inexplicably, a week later, announced mass firings.   So the question is, which is it?  Is USAGM and the work it supports unsalvageable waste, as you have said, or is it a critical tool for diplomacy and facts?  What you are doing isn't efficiency, it's chaos.  The dysfunction lies in the administration's allergy to truth and democracy, the two pillars that USAGM aims to promote abroad.   So I'm not surprised by the choice to gut USAGM since the first Trump administration targeted the enterprise, violating laws and journalistic integrity to shape it into a state media like Russia's or North Korea's.