Locking in the DOGE Cuts: Ending Waste, Fraud, and Abuse for Good
Government Efficiency, Financial Management and Intergovernmental Relations
2025-06-24
Loading video...
Summary
Summary of the Subcommittee Meeting on Delivering on Government Efficiency
The hearing of the Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) convened to discuss efforts to reduce government spending and improve efficiency, kicking off with a video highlighting the mission to achieve a smaller, less bureaucratic government that lives within its means by cutting waste, red tape, and streamlining operations. Speakers in the video emphasized the need to eliminate duplicate departments, promote competition for better services, and systematically root out waste to save billions of dollars for American taxpayers. The meeting quickly devolved into a contentious debate, with stark disagreements over the effectiveness and motivations behind DOGE's initiatives.
Themes
Goals of DOGE and Waste Reduction
Chairwoman Marjorie Taylor Greene stated that DOGE is actively delivering on promises to reduce the deficit and the size of government, unlike previous Democratic leaders whom she claims failed in similar efforts.[ 00:17:44-00:17:47 ] She asserted that DOGE has identified $180 billion in savings by staunching waste, fraud, and abuse in federal spending, targeting areas such as "corrupt anti-American NGOs," "illegal DEI programs," and "wasteful, unnecessary federal grants, contracts, leases, and personnel."[ 00:18:39-00:19:36 ] The administration, via DOGE, has proposed a $9 billion rescission request and a budget that would reduce non-discretionary spending by $163 billion, aiming for $2 trillion in savings over the coming decade to tackle the national debt.[ 00:22:26 ]
Witnesses Matthew Dickerson, David Burton, and Dan Lips largely supported DOGE's objectives, emphasizing the unsustainable national debt and the urgent need for fiscal changes.[ 00:32:23-00:32:25 ] They pointed to high levels of improper payments and the need to address entitlement spending to avoid a fiscal crisis. Dickerson suggested Congress use appropriations, workforce reforms, rescissions, and reconciliation to lock in DOGE's savings, while Lips noted that DOGE's efforts align with decades of bipartisan government reform initiatives, advocating for legislative action to ensure lasting efficiency.
Criticism of DOGE and its Negative Impact
Ranking Member Melanie Ann Stansbury characterized DOGE as a "scam in service of a political agenda," noting that a recent poll showed 67% of voters believed DOGE has done a bad job.[ 00:26:20 ] She argued that DOGE has led to "chaotic, destructive, and ideological war" against Americans and vital programs, potentially costing more than it saved due to mass firings, dismantled agencies, and operational chaos.
Emily DiVito, a witness, stated that DOGE has failed by increasing costs, confusion, and complexity, and undermining consumer protections.[ 00:48:14-00:48:23 ] She detailed how DOGE's interventions have disrupted access to critical benefits for millions, including Social Security recipients and veterans, leading to longer wait times, reduced services, and even closure of medical facilities.[ 00:49:08-00:49:48 ] DiVito also highlighted cuts to IRS enforcement teams and scientific research funding, predicting negative impacts on U.S. revenue, innovation, and global health programs. Representatives Stephen Lynch and Suhas Subramanyam echoed these concerns, citing stalled life-saving clinical trials for veterans and delays in Social Security claims due to DOGE's actions.
Partisan Disagreement and Political Motivations
The meeting was marked by deep partisan division, with Chairwoman Greene accusing Democratic colleagues of mocking DOGE and promoting big government and spending, while also criticizing "absurd" and "disgusting" grants related to LGBTQ+ issues and racial justice as "far left ideology" and funding "genital mutilation of children."
Conversely, Ms. Stansbury explicitly linked DOGE to "Project 2025," a conservative initiative, accusing its proponents of aiming to remake the U.S. government with a "hyper conservative worldview" and engaging in "cancel culture" to eliminate programs they dislike. Representative Jasmine Felicia Crockett accused Republicans of an "aggressive attack on the working class families" and benefiting billionaires, coining DOGE as an acronym for "disinformation, obstruction, greed, and exploitation." The highly charged atmosphere included personal attacks and procedural skirmishes, such as a motion to subpoena Elon Musk, the former head of DOGE, which was tabled after a recorded vote.
Tone of the Meeting
The tone of the meeting was notably contentious and deeply polarized from the outset.[ 00:17:44-00:18:34 ] [ 00:26:09-00:26:35 ] There was a clear and sharp division along party lines, with Republicans staunchly advocating for DOGE's efficiency measures and Democrats vehemently opposing them, viewing them as a destructive political agenda.[ 00:17:44-00:18:34 ] [ 00:26:09-00:26:35 ] The discourse was characterized by frequent accusations and strong, often inflammatory language, including terms like "scam," "waste," "fraud," "abuse," "genital mutilation," "authoritarian approach," and "terrorizing the public." The meeting included several heated exchanges, personal remarks, and procedural interruptions, most notably a motion to subpoena Elon Musk that led to a recorded vote and further disruption. Both sides expressed a sense of urgency and alarm, with Republicans warning of an impending fiscal crisis and Democrats expressing serious concerns about the damage to vital public services and democratic institutions.[ 00:27:31-00:27:38 ]
Participants
Transcript
Sign up for free to see the full transcript
Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.