Full Committee Hearing "Serving and Voting: Oversight of the Federal Voting Assistance Program”
Committee on House Administration
2025-06-24
Loading video...
Summary
The hearing of the Committee on House Administration focused on the oversight of the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) and the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens' Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA), aiming to identify ways to enhance voting access for active duty military personnel and overseas citizens.[ 00:06:32-00:06:36 ] [ 00:08:19-00:08:27 ] [ 00:17:01-00:17:03 ] While acknowledging the critical role of these programs, participants expressed concerns about low voter participation rates and the practical challenges faced by military and overseas voters.[ 00:09:36-00:09:38 ] [ 00:12:07 ] [ 00:12:10 ]
Themes
Challenges in Military and Overseas Voting
Active duty military and overseas citizens face significant hurdles in exercising their right to vote.[ 00:11:51 ] Only 26% of active duty military voters covered by UOCAVA cast ballots in the 2022 general election, significantly lower than the national average, and the participation rate for overseas citizens was an estimated 3.4%.[ 00:09:38 ] [ 00:12:07 ] [ 00:12:10 ] Key obstacles identified include issues with ballot delivery, with 15% of military voters reporting not receiving their ballot in time or at all.[ 00:12:00 ] Other challenges encompass time, distance, and mobility, leading to situations where military families might not receive ballots or have to pay for courier services.[ 00:12:15 ] [ 00:20:40 ] These difficulties are often exacerbated for non-federal and off-cycle local elections, and service members are not automatically registered to vote upon enlistment.[ 00:45:49 ]
Federal Voting Assistance Program's Role and Efforts
The FVAP is responsible for implementing UOCAVA, which is the sole federal statute dedicated to protecting the voting rights of active duty military, their families, and overseas citizens.[ 00:08:39 ] [ 00:09:04 ] FVAP aims to inform, educate, and empower UOCAVA voters globally, primarily through its website, FVAP.gov, which provides state-specific voting information and tools.[ 00:17:35 ] [ 00:17:56 ] [ 00:18:06 ] The program trains nearly 3,000 voting assistance officers, conducts voting emphasis weeks, and uses targeted digital communication and social media to reach voters.[ 00:17:44 ] FVAP also works closely with state and local election officials to ensure compliance with UOCAVA requirements, such as the 45-day ballot transmission period and electronic blank ballot delivery, and provides postage-free envelope templates. The local election office holds the responsibility for verifying voter identity.[ 00:22:00 ] The FVAP emphasizes its role in facilitating the voting process by providing tools and resources, rather than operating as a "get out the vote" campaign.[ 00:38:45-00:39:08 ]
Partisan Disagreements and Legislative Concerns
A significant point of contention arose regarding legislative proposals that could impact military and overseas voters. Ranking Member Morelle criticized House Republicans for advancing the SAVE Act and a President's executive order, which he argued would "severely hinder ballot access" by potentially ending mail and online voter registration, thus requiring impossible in-person registration for many overseas military members. Witnesses from FVAP maintained a neutral stance on these legislative proposals, stating that the department would provide formal responses if they passed into law.[ 00:25:06 ] Concerns were also raised about the FVAP's capacity, as it currently has seven employees, with three having taken retirement packages, though Dr. Clark affirmed their ability to fulfill UOCAVA requirements with current resources.[ 00:47:40 ] [ 00:48:17 ]
Tone of the Meeting
The overall tone of the meeting was respectful and professional, with all members acknowledging the importance of supporting military and overseas voting.[ 00:07:09 ] [ 00:11:48 ] [ 00:17:01 ] However, there was an underlying tension due to partisan disagreements over election legislation, particularly concerning the potential impact of proposed bills like the SAVE Act on voting access. Despite these differences, members expressed a bipartisan commitment to finding ways to improve voting access for these critical populations.[ 00:29:15 ]
Participants
Transcript
Sign up for free to see the full transcript
Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.