Oversight Hearing titled “Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness.”

House Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries

2025-06-04

Loading video...

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

The Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries convened an oversight hearing titled "Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness" to discuss ways to bolster commercial and recreational fishing across the United States. The discussion focused on challenges facing the U.S. seafood industry, the role of regulatory frameworks, and the importance of scientific data in ensuring sustainable and competitive fisheries.

Themes

Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness and Regulatory Reform

The hearing addressed the Trump administration's executive order aimed at restoring American seafood competitiveness by reducing regulatory burdens for the fishing industry and promoting its growth [ 00:23:11-00:23:18 ]

. The Chair highlighted the goal of enhancing commercial fishing, supporting millions of jobs, and generating conservation investments [ 00:22:11-00:22:22 ] . Key challenges identified included issues with science and data collection, regulatory hurdles from the Endangered Species Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act, and restrictions on water access [ 00:22:41-00:22:58 ] . Witnesses noted that regional councils are actively working with NOAA to implement the executive order by submitting recommendations to reduce burdens and increase production . The executive order's emphasis on expanding exempted fishing permits (EFPs) was seen as relevant for promoting recreational fishing opportunities, particularly in transitioning to state-led management models for fisheries like Gulf Red Snapper . Several speakers advocated for states to manage their own fisheries, citing the success of Florida's 126-day Gulf Red Snapper season compared to the limited one-day season in the Southeast Atlantic under NOAA management .

Importance of Science and Data in Fisheries Management and NOAA Funding

A central theme was the critical role of robust scientific data and adequate funding for NOAA in effective fisheries management. The Ranking Member criticized the Trump administration's cuts to NOAA funding and staff, arguing that these actions undermine the seafood industry's competitiveness by leading to vacant positions, canceled research, and delayed compliance reviews for hatcheries [ 00:24:44-00:25:23 ]

[ 00:25:36-00:25:57 ] . Multiple speakers stressed that a fully funded and staffed NOAA is essential for timely surveys, accurate stock assessments, and vigorous oversight, without which the industry risks significant losses . Concerns were raised that management decisions are often based on inaccurate or uncertain data, such as that from the Federal Recreational Data Collection System (MRIP), leading to restrictive measures that harm fishermen . It was highlighted that NOAA budget cuts and staffing reductions directly impede fish surveys and stock assessments, forcing councils to apply precautionary, lower catch limits . Witnesses emphasized the need for greater collaboration between scientists and fishermen in data collection to ensure accuracy and build trust .

Threat of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing and Foreign Competition

The discussion also focused on the significant threat posed by illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing and unfair foreign competition. The Chair noted the need to counter the aggression of China and Russia in the seafood sector [ 00:22:31 ]

. Critics argued that the administration's actions, such as dismantling the Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP), undermine efforts to combat IUU fishing and cripple agencies responsible for fisheries management . It was stated that transparency is crucial because foreign actors, including Russia, flood global markets with mislabeled products, creating unfair competition for U.S. fishermen [ 01:10:21-01:10:26 ] . Speakers pointed out that Alaska's seafood industry particularly struggles against non-market economies like China and Russia, which heavily subsidize their fleets and have lower vessel construction costs . Concerns were also raised about the national security implications of foreign fishing fleets, particularly those from China and Russia, which may engage in espionage near U.S. military installations and infrastructure .

Specific Challenges and Solutions in Fisheries

Several specific challenges and potential solutions were highlighted for different fisheries. For North Atlantic right whales, the current regulations, including area closures and gear modifications, were described as imposing significant financial and physical burdens on fishermen, often based on insufficient real-time data . Non-invasive tagging and real-time location data were suggested as more effective solutions than broad closures . Shark depredation, where sharks eat hooked fish, was identified as a growing problem that affects the sustainability of target species and creates an imbalance in mortality data . The Shark Act was supported to establish a task force for science-based solutions . The importance of forage fish, such as sardines and anchovies, was underscored as the backbone of the ocean food web, with bipartisan legislation proposed to ensure their conservation . The "gray zone" dispute near Machias Seal Island, where U.S. and Canadian fishermen operate under different regulations, was cited as an issue needing resolution through co-management or full U.S. sovereignty .

Tone of the Meeting

The tone of the meeting was largely contentious, marked by a clear partisan divide, especially concerning the Trump administration's impact on NOAA funding and regulatory actions [ 00:24:44-00:25:23 ]

. While there was a shared interest in supporting American fishermen and ensuring sustainable fisheries, expressed through calls for better data and science-based management, the approaches differed significantly between the majority and minority members [ 00:21:53-00:22:02 ] [ 00:23:57-00:24:25 ] . Witnesses generally conveyed a sense of concern regarding the impacts of budget cuts and regulatory uncertainty on their livelihoods and communities . The cultural and economic importance of the fishing industry to coastal communities was a recurrent and emotive point raised by many speakers [ 00:22:05-00:22:11 ] .

Participants

Transcript

The Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries will come to order.  Good morning, everyone.  I want to welcome members, witnesses, and our guests in the audience in today's hearing.  Without objection, the chair is authorized to declare a recess of the subcommittee at any time.   Under Committee Rule 4F, any oral opening statements at hearings are limited to the chair and the ranking member.  I therefore ask unanimous consent that all other members' opening statements be made part of the hearing record if they are submitted in accordance with Committee Rule 3-0.  Without objection, so ordered.  I also ask unanimous consent that the Congressman from Alaska, Mr. Begich, the Congressman from Georgia, Mr. Carter,   the Congressman from Florida, Mr. Rutherford, and the Congressman from South Carolina, Mr. Fry, be allowed to participate in today's hearing.  Without objection, so ordered.  We are here today to hold an oversight hearing titled Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness.  I now recognize myself for a five-minute opening statement.   Today, the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries is holding a hearing on restoring America's seafood competitiveness.  We will be specifically focusing on how we can bolster both commercial and recreational fishing across the United States.   Millions of Americans depend on fishing for their livelihoods and to connect with their communities.  Both recreational and commercial fishing are tremendous economic drivers.  Ensuring access to our abundant fishery resources supports millions of jobs and generates millions of dollars in conservation investments through excise tax revenues.   Our domestic seafood sector, including its role in our food supply chain and as a major part of our trade strategy, makes massive contributions to our economy.  Enhancing the commercial sector can also serve important geopolitical goals, like countering the aggression of the Chinese Communist Party and Russia.
In recent years, however, both our fishing sectors have faced tremendous challenges.  Whether it is issues related to the science and data collection used to inform management decisions under the Federal Fisheries Management System, regulatory challenges associated with implementation of the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act, or additional efforts to restrict access to our waters, fishing in the United States has become quite complicated.   with our smaller independent fishermen facing the most challenges.  The good news is that President Trump is committed to addressing these issues.  In April, he signed an executive order titled Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness, which is intended to reduce regulatory burdens and restrictions to ensure that the American fishing industry can thrive.  President Trump's executive order directed the Secretary of Commerce to work with the eight regional fishery management councils   to make the necessary changes to reduce regulatory burdens, to adopt new technologies to improve management, and work with stakeholders across this community.  Today's hearing is intended as a signal to those stakeholders that Congress will support President Trump in these efforts and will work with this administration to develop the necessary approach   to chart a better path forward.  We look forward to partnering with the Trump administration to carry out these shared goals.  The United States has long served as the world's gold standard for fisheries management.  The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act is a cooperative, stakeholder-driven approach to fisheries management in the United States.  This approach has long been supported and trusted by the many stakeholders in working with the eight fishery management councils.   and yet challenges still persist.  As the President's Executive Order states, one central challenge for both the recreational and commercial sectors has been the lack of adequate data to inform fisheries management decisions.
A lack of complete data can lead to shorter fishing seasons and more restrictions.  That is why conducting thorough, complete stock assessments and fisheries surveys to sustainably manage our federal fisheries is at the core of NOAA's mission.   This work must not only continue, but it must be prioritized.  A common theme throughout our WWF hearings on a variety of topics has been the need for certainty and stability for our industries and small businesses.   Perhaps the biggest driver of economic instability has been the federal government's promulgation of overburdensome regulations.  Within our jurisdiction, the ambiguity and lack of clarity that environmental statutes like the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act are the main drivers in this area.  Our fishermen and women simply do not know what the rules are going to be from administration to administration.   That isn't fair to them, and such a situation undermines their ability to invest in their fleets and in infrastructure.  As we have heard in recent months and years, both the commercial and recreational sectors have faced undue burdens under both the ESA and the MMPA.  Reforming and modernizing these statutes will help reduce burdens, promote access to our marine resources, and provide certainty and clarity for the regulated community, while at the same time protecting our fisheries and marine resources.   We can, in other words, continue to protect our marine and mammal species while also protecting our fishing industries.

Sign up for free to see the full transcript

Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.