Breach of Trust: Surveillance in Private Spaces

House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation

2025-05-20

Loading video...

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

This meeting convened to address the pervasive issue of covert surveillance and privacy violations, particularly in rented spaces such as short-term rentals and hotel rooms [ 00:48:27 ]

. Chairwoman Nancy Ruth Mace delivered a powerful opening statement, sharing her personal experience as a survivor of hidden camera voyeurism and sexual assault, underscoring the urgent need for robust legislative action to protect victims and enhance privacy rights . The discussion highlighted the ease with which surveillance technology can be acquired and misused, and the current legal shortcomings in addressing such crimes .

Themes

Personal Trauma and Violation of Privacy

Chairwoman Mace shared her harrowing experience of discovering she had been secretly filmed and raped by her former fiancé, Patrick Bryant, over several years . She detailed how he cataloged videos of women, including herself, without their knowledge or consent, some depicting sexual acts and even rape . This deeply personal account emphasized that hidden cameras not only invade physical spaces but destroy lives, causing lasting trauma and a profound sense of betrayal .

Accessibility and Concealment of Covert Surveillance Devices

Witnesses highlighted how modern surveillance technology, including small, high-definition cameras and audio recorders, is inexpensive and readily available online . Mr. Joseph LaSorsa demonstrated several devices disguised as common household items like smoke detectors, power adapters, and computer mice, which can hide in plain sight and avoid easy detection . This accessibility makes it easy for individuals to deploy highly effective covert surveillance with minimal effort or technical skill .

Inadequacy of Current Laws and Need for Federal Standards

Current U.S. laws regulating surveillance devices are considered outdated and insufficient, often failing to restrict possession or adequately define consent in contexts like short-term rentals . State laws, such as South Carolina's, are deemed "weak" with misdemeanors and small fines for first-time voyeurism, failing to deliver justice for victims . The speakers called for establishing a federal privacy expectation standard for short-term rentals and clarifying penalties for covert surveillance without clear consent .

Role and Policies of Travel Technology Platforms

Ms. Laura Chadwick, representing the Travel Technology Association, affirmed that member companies have unequivocal policies prohibiting surveillance devices in private spaces of short-term rentals . While they encourage guests to report violations and investigate incidents, leading to potential property removal, questions arose about the enforcement effectiveness and whether hosts who covertly record guests are permanently banned . The CNN report cited 35,000 complaints about hidden cameras in Airbnb rentals, indicating a significant ongoing problem .

Disproportionate Impact on Women and Minority Communities

The discussion underscored that women are often primary targets of harassment and surveillance [ 00:50:37 ]

. Mr. Alan Butler affirmed that history shows certain demographics, particularly women and girls, are more likely to be targeted for intimate privacy violations [ 01:13:11 ] . Additionally, Black and brown communities face disproportionate surveillance by law enforcement, often utilizing facial recognition technology with significant error rates for darker skin tones, raising concerns about unfair targeting .

Proposed Legislative and Protective Measures

Chairwoman Mace introduced the "Sue Voyeurs Act" and the "Stop Voyeurs Act" to create a civil right of action for victims and expand federal prohibition of video voyeurism . Recommendations include banning surveillance in private areas of rentals, requiring full disclosure of all devices, and informed consent from renters . Individuals are advised to be aware of the lack of protections, act as if they are under surveillance, and look for "extra" devices in rented spaces .

Tone of the Meeting

The tone of the meeting was largely somber, serious, and deeply empathetic, driven by Chairwoman Mace's emotional and powerful personal testimony . There was a strong sense of urgency and shared concern among all participants regarding the pervasive nature of covert surveillance and its traumatic impact on victims [ 00:48:59 ]

. While professional in presentation, the underlying sentiment was one of indignation towards perpetrators and a resolute call for justice, stronger legal protections, and unwavering support for survivors .

Participants

Transcript

Good afternoon.  Now that we have one other member here, we have a quorum on the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation.  We will come to order and welcome everyone.  The ranking member is on her way over.  Without objection, the chair may declare recess at any time, and I recognize myself for the purpose of making an opening statement.   And I am gonna go a little longer than usual, so I apologize.  Liberty begins with the right to close a door.  A hidden camera kicks that door off its hinges.  The Constitution's Fourth Amendment enshrines a reasonable expectation of privacy.  Yet today, that freedom is violated by secret cameras and hidden devices to record women and girls with impunity.   Freedom is not a theory.  It is the right to breathe.  It is the right to dress and undress, to sleep without someone's camera filming your naked body.  The founders wrote liberty in parchment, but hidden cameras erase it in pixels.  I speak not just as a lawmaker, but as a survivor.   Starting on November 5th, 2023, I discovered my former fiance, Patrick Bryant, had filmed women without their knowledge, without their permission, and without their consent.  He filmed rape, too.  He appeared to catalog his tapes and footage and images and photos in the way that he saved the files, and he stored these images, photos, and videos for years.   This isn't just creepy, it's criminal, but only under weak state laws.  In South Carolina, first-time voyeurs face a misdemeanor and a small $500 fine.  That's not justice, that is betrayal.  Real men guard a woman's privacy, but predators harvest it.
When predators install covert cameras or forge explicit images, they do not just invade a room, they invade a life.  And that life deserves more than a misdemeanor.  Exhibit one, behind me is a screenshot from one of the videos I found of myself.  The yellow circle, this naked silhouette, is my naked body.   I didn't know that I had been filmed.  I didn't give my consent.  I didn't give my permission.  And this particular video that Patrick Bryant recorded of me on his secret camera, he saved for over three years without my knowledge.   I didn't pick this fight.  I don't even want to be here today and discuss this.  But because he's still roaming around South Carolina free, filming whatever genital parts he wants, because no one has held him accountable, he's not in jail, he's not had to pay a fine, no restitution.   He's able to rape other women, film them.  And when I discovered this video, I discovered that he utilized up to four potential devices, and I wouldn't be surprised if there were more.  I was filmed in secret.  The camera sat silent, yet it screened my safety was negotiable and my dignity disposable.  All right.   This is an image of Patrick Bryant and the co-owner of that property trying to lick his face.  I think it says a lot about a man's character and what he was doing behind the scenes.   This next image I'm going to show, and I'm going to ask unanimous consent to enter it into the record, is the property where many women were filmed.  This is the property where I found this hidden camera, another device, at least one other device was used here to film women without their knowledge, without their permission, without their consent.