National Economic Security, Advancing US Interests Abroad

2025-05-14

Loading video...

Summary

The hearing addressed how the United States can more effectively prioritize economic statecraft, particularly focusing on the Department of State's role in advancing U.S. interests abroad and navigating a changing global economic landscape[ 00:06:57 ] [ 00:07:10 ] . Participants highlighted the critical link between economic security and national security, stressing the need for structural reforms and a coherent strategy to address current challenges[ 00:09:51 ]

Themes

The Role and Reorganization of the State Department in Economic Statecraft

The Department of State has been described as "adrift" over the years, with its functions and authorities often absorbed by other agencies[ 00:07:18 ] . Historically, the State Department led economic statecraft for over 170 years, but this changed in 1961 with the creation of new agencies like the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)[ 00:07:27 ] . This fragmentation has led to challenges such as limited market access for U.S. businesses and susceptibility to predatory foreign competition[ 00:08:29 ]

[ 00:09:10 ] . Proposals for reform include establishing a Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security to lead an interagency economic command center and integrating economic specialists into the diplomatic corps. However, some caution that centralizing all functions under one roof may not be ideal and could be fraught with bureaucratic and cost challenges. The current State Department personnel system, with its rotational assignments, is seen as working against officials playing a central economic role, as trade negotiations require long-term technical expertise. It was also noted that economic jobs are often viewed as "backwater assignments" within the State Department[ 00:28:41 ] . A strong, empowered State Department with a culture that highly values economic work and sufficient resources is deemed crucial[ 00:47:22 ] .

U.S. Economic Strategy and Global Impact

There are significant concerns that current U.S. trade and economic policies are creating uncertainty among Asian partners, leading them to question the U.S. endgame and reliability. While the U.S. uses a "stick approach" with tariffs, China is seen as engaging in a "charm offensive" by offering infrastructure projects and portraying itself as a defender of the rules-based system. This has prompted other countries to diversify away from the U.S. and forge new trade agreements without its participation, potentially disadvantaging American interests. Panelists emphasized that economic policy must be fair, sustainable, and anchored in a coherent framework, acknowledging that global economic landscapes have changed faster than U.S. policies[ 00:27:54 ]

. Despite the turbulence, many allies still desire U.S. engagement, leadership, and market access, indicating a demand signal for U.S. partnership, albeit perhaps in new ways[ 01:35:01 ] . The importance of American economic growth and innovation as the ultimate source of national power was also highlighted[ 00:51:48 ] .

Addressing Economic Vulnerabilities and Competition with China

The U.S. faces vulnerabilities related to reliance on foreign sources, particularly China, for critical minerals and defense industrial base components[ 01:12:28 ]

[ 01:24:09 ] . Chinese lending practices have contributed to unsustainable debt crises in Pacific Island countries, raising concerns for U.S. interests and requiring greater transparency and alternative financing options[ 01:07:01 ] . To counter these vulnerabilities, the U.S. needs to control the processing of critical minerals, address price volatility, and deepen partnerships with allies to diversify supply chains[ 01:12:28 ] . It is crucial to specifically identify and stop investments and capital flows into China that threaten national security without mimicking China's industrial policy[ 00:51:46 ] . Working closely with allies and partners is considered key to effectively addressing the China challenge and its non-market practices[ 01:14:01 ] .

Reforming Economic Statecraft Structure and Principles

The existing structure of economic statecraft is fragmented across numerous agencies with little coordinating capacity. Speakers advocated for shifting away from a "tools-based approach" to an "end-state approach" focused on desired strategic effects. Key principles for effective economic statecraft include working with, not against, the American private sector, fostering innovation, and prudently using government initiatives to address market failures. Emphasis was placed on the need for smart economic statecraft that balances defensive and offensive efforts, protects and promotes economic interests, and gains the support of the American people[ 00:34:08 ]

. Leveraging the private sector and allies, and ensuring legislative backing for trade policies to ensure their longevity, were also highlighted as important considerations[ 00:35:01 ] [ 01:36:09 ] .

Tone of the Meeting

The tone of the meeting was serious and concerned, reflecting a collective understanding of the significant challenges facing U.S. economic statecraft[ 00:19:45 ]

[ 00:25:11 ] [ 00:30:45 ] . Despite some differing views on specific policy implementations, there was a clear bipartisan consensus on the critical importance of integrating economic policy with foreign and national security objectives[ 00:11:25 ] [ 00:46:46 ] . The discussion conveyed a sense of urgency for structural reforms and a more coherent strategy, while also expressing an underlying forward-looking perspective and a desire to capitalize on current opportunities[ 00:16:45 ] . Speakers were generally collaborative, seeking constructive ways to enhance U.S. economic influence globally[ 00:46:46 ] .