Enhancing Competition: Shaping the Future of Bank Mergers and De Novo Formation

House Financial Services Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade

2025-05-14

Loading video...

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

This meeting focused on the state of the U.S. banking system, specifically addressing the challenges and opportunities related to the formation of new banks (de novo banks) and the process of bank mergers. Participants, including current and aspiring bankers, legal experts, and policy advocates, highlighted the critical role of community-focused financial institutions in serving local economies and small businesses . The discussion emphasized the pervasive regulatory hurdles and market dynamics that impact competition and access to credit, advocating for reforms to foster a more vibrant and equitable financial landscape .

Themes

Challenges and Importance of De Novo Bank Formation

The number of new banks formed annually has dramatically declined since the 2008 financial crisis, largely due to increased regulatory burdens and significantly higher capital requirements [ 00:11:54-00:12:23 ]

. Speakers stressed that de novo banks are essential for local competition, providing tailored services to small businesses, and addressing underserved communities [ 00:11:30-00:11:40 ] . Specific challenges include the difficulty of raising substantial initial capital, lengthy and unpredictable approval timelines from regulators, and high compliance costs, which disproportionately affect new entrants . Proposed solutions include tiered capital requirements and a more reasoned approach from regulators regarding business plan deviations, as outlined in H.R. 478, the Promoting New Bank Formation Act . Calls were also made for streamlining processes and providing technical assistance for Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs), given the scarcity of regulatory experience with their unique needs .

Bank Mergers and Regulatory Review Process

Bank mergers are considered a healthy part of capitalism, enabling institutions to achieve economies of scale, expand product offerings, and enhance their competitive impact . However, the current regulatory review process is criticized for being slow, opaque, and inconsistent, causing significant delays that expose parties to escalating risks and financial uncertainty [ 00:44:26-00:44:44 ]

. Speakers highlighted how the prolonged review of public comments can hold up transactions and expressed concerns about recent policy changes, such as the OCC's revised criteria for evaluating merger applications and the Department of Justice's withdrawal from past guidelines [ 00:35:06-00:35:09 ] . Solutions proposed include "shot clock" legislation to enforce timely decisions, improving the expedited review process, and modernizing competition analysis to include a broader range of financial service providers beyond traditional banks [ 01:44:39-01:45:05 ] .

Impact of Regulations and Discrimination

The discussion highlighted that regulations, particularly those stemming from the Dodd-Frank Act, have increased compliance costs and led to a shift of lending outside of heavily regulated banks to less regulated entities . Inconsistent regulatory policies and "wild swings" in approaches create uncertainty for the banking industry, hindering stability and strategic planning [ 00:53:10-00:53:14 ]

. Ms. Young shared her personal experience of discriminatory lending practices, underscoring the vital role of strong banking regulations and data transparency, particularly Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank, to protect consumers from financial harm . Concerns were also raised about the categorical denial of banking services to certain legitimate businesses, such as independent ATM operators, based on inaccurate perceptions of risk .

Tone of the Meeting

The tone of the meeting was largely earnest and concerned about the long-term health and accessibility of the U.S. banking system . Speakers maintained a professional demeanor, leveraging their extensive experience to articulate challenges and propose concrete solutions [ 00:10:40-00:11:03 ]

. There was a palpable sense of urgency regarding the need for regulatory reforms to reverse the decline in new bank formations and streamline merger processes . Moments of frustration were evident concerning regulatory complexity, inconsistency, and the slow pace of change . The testimonies from Mrs. Young and Mr. Green introduced passionate conviction on the issues of discrimination and equitable access to capital, highlighting systemic inequalities . Overall, the discussion was solution-oriented, seeking bipartisan approaches to foster a more competitive and inclusive banking ecosystem .

Participants

Transcript

4,500 today.  When I was a business owner starting and growing our small business, I saw the value of having a diverse banking system with a wide distribution of institutions by size firsthand.   Having multiple banks in the community strengthened the negotiating power of our small businesses and the many others in our area by forcing financial institutions to compete with one another for our business.  Strong competition in the banking system has been shown to lead to better terms, better interest rates, and services for American communities.   I don't think there's a single member of this committee that doesn't believe that we should use our positions here to support small community banks and credit unions.  To do so, we should enact policies that support those institutions, as well as the community development financial institutions and minority depository institutions that step in to fill the gaps left by other firms.  And today, these institutions also face an   unprecedented economic and regulatory uncertainty brought on by the Trump administration's new policies.  The president has doubled down on the market wrenching tariff policies from his first term that directly impact the farmers and the rural communities that many members, including myself, represent, as well as paralyzed manufacturers and small businesses who work with our community banks.  Examiners of these institutions are being laid off in the name of efficiency.   when staff shortages at the Prudential Regulators have been cited by the Inspector Generals as an area of concern.  We see a move to cut off funding for the CDFI Fund, which has provided more than $12 billion of support access to credit and to support access to credit in unbanked and underbanked communities.  Meanwhile, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has effectively been shut down, meaning that small community banks are being supervised for compliance with consumer protection laws.   while the biggest banks have no oversight at all in this area.  It's easy to say deregulation is the solution to the challenges that community banks and credit unions face, but that sentiment ignores other reforms that would
M
Ms. Mary Usategui

Sign up for free to see the full transcript

Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.