20250507: SPF Hearing: Update on Air Force Projection Forces Aviation Programs and Capabilities

House Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces

2025-05-07

Loading video...

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

No summary available.

Participants

Transcript

Their commitment to excellence is nothing short of extraordinary.  As chairman, I believe it is our responsibility to ensure that our airmen have the resources, training, and capabilities needed to maintain that leading edge.   Today's discussion will address key areas, including fleet modernization, emerging technologies, and strategic deterrence.  I know the budget is not out, but I look forward to hearing the Air Force's priorities and any struggles we can help with.  I want to focus on the critical role of the bomber and mobility platforms.  Our bomber fleet remains a cornerstone of strategic deterrence, and modernization efforts must keep pace with evolving threats.   Meanwhile, mobility platforms are the backbone of our operational effectiveness, allowing us to move personnel, equipment and supplies with unmatched efficiency across the globe.  The world is changing rapidly and adversaries are invested heavily in advanced capabilities that threaten our national security.   It is imperative that we remain ahead of those threats by strengthening our operational capabilities, enhancing cybersecurity measures, and fostering innovation within the defense industry.  I look forward to hearing from our distinguished witnesses, engaging in thoughtful discussion, and working together to find solutions that ensure the continued strength of our Air Force.  I'd like in turn to turn it over to my friend, Ranking Member Courtney.   Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and to the witnesses for being here today.  You know, sometimes people think that the subcommittee is only focused on Navy issues, but the Projection Forces mission is definitely very central to the work that we do.
And again, over the years of the programs we're going to discuss here today, you know, we've been very active both in terms of   authorization language as well as oversight of those programs.  I will say I think it's unfortunate that this hearing is happening without an actual fiscal year 2026 budget request, which normally is the case when this hearing is held.   AND ALTHOUGH HASK'S RECONCILIATION BILL INCLUDED FUNDS FOR PROJECTION FORCES PROGRAMS, THE BILL WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY TIED TO FY2026 BUDGET BUT WAS RATHER FRAMED IN A FOUR-YEAR TIMELINE FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS AND EIGHT YEARS FOR ACTUAL EXPENDITURE OR EXECUTION OF THOSE FUNDS.  I WOULD NOTE THAT BOTH CHAIRS OF THE HOUSE   And Senate Armed Services Committee over the weekend criticized the so-called skinny budget document that came out in OMB's attempt to roll reconciliation into the total defense request and their characterization of it as a $1 trillion budget.  As both Chairman Wicker and Rogers note, the actual 2026 baseline budget request is a cut when accounting for inflation.   just this morning mr rogers highlighted to politico that pinning hopes on the defense boost via reconciliation is a risky bet you know the best way to to really handle this situation is just to make sure that the programs that we're going to discuss here today like many other programs in the defense budget are actually included in the baseline 2026   budget and hopefully as NDAA you know kicks off and we get the full budget that is going to be the outcome and again I would note that in the reconciliation bill there are many of the programs and projection forces were included but again with no timeline in terms of when they actually have to be executed and that's not what you know our military needs right now the the need to get these platforms and these programs moving forward