Loading video...

Source: Congress.gov

Participants

Transcript

It's clear that artificial intelligence will have a profound transformative effect on our country.  My experience leading the bipartisan AI task force last year strengthened my belief that maintaining American leadership in AI development and deployment is not only an economic imperative, but also a national security requirement that affects every sector of our economy and our society.   As we examine the implication of DeepSeek's recent AI models, our nation is at a critical juncture in the global artificial intelligence landscape.  The introduction of DeepSeek represents a concerning milestone.  It's the first non-American reasoning AI model.  This capability, pioneered by American companies, is now being replicated by a company directly influenced by the Chinese Communist Party.  This development should raise concerns for all of us.   We must consider what's at risk.  Americans and people worldwide are increasingly sharing their private and personal data with AI systems.  The deployment of DeepSeek provides the CCP with a backdoor to this sensitive information.  This risk will only grow as we enter the era of agentic AI, where AI systems will actively book our travel, manage our finances, analyze our health records, and handle other sensitive personal affairs on our behalf.   We cannot allow DeepSeq and other CCP-controlled entities access to this information.  However, there's also a silver lining in this situation.  DeepSeq reportedly distilled their models from open AI systems, demonstrating that Chinese AI development remains reliant on our innovations.   And furthermore, despite the claim that DeepSeq R1 achieves similar results to American models at a lower cost, Google recently announced its open-weight Gemma 3 model, which reportedly achieves 98 percent of DeepSeq R1's performance for just 3 percent of the cost.  American ingenuity continues to lead the way, but we cannot take our continued leadership for granted.  Open-weight models underpin much of the AI and technology infrastructure worldwide, including here in the United States.   If we allow China to surpass us in open weight models, we risk ceding leadership in global AI infrastructure to the CCP.
It's crucial that we understand the capabilities of these models, the CCP goals they could propagate, and their potential vulnerabilities in order to encourage the adoption of American models over those developed in China.  This is precisely why the federal government and American industry must collaborate to ensure continued American leadership in the development of AI standards.  If the United States does not set these standards, then China will.   China's approach to AI development has also raised serious ethical and security concerns, especially relating to the prevention of harmful applications of AI.  For example, according to an evaluation by Anthropic, DeepSeek's model was found to be the least effective at blocking information about bioweapons amongst all the models that they tested.  While Chinese AI has so-called safeguards against providing information about Tiananmen Square and the Uyghurs, it lacks safeguards against actual malicious uses of AI.   We must ensure that Chinese AI, which operates under these flawed standards, does not come to dominate the global market.  The United States must take the lead in developing the most advanced AI systems while also fostering a light touch governance model that safeguards against malicious use while simultaneously encouraging innovation.  We cannot afford to stifle our innovators with burdensome regulations when competitors like China are racing ahead with fewer constraints.   Promoting innovation and AI development is the key to maintaining American leadership in this field.  To support this, I, along with some of the people on our committee here, have introduced the Create AI Act again in this Congress, which establishes the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource.  This will provide researchers and developers across the computational and data resources they need to create competitive American AI systems that embody our values rather than those of the CCP.   I'd like to thank our witnesses for being here today.  I look forward to your testimony and to having a productive discussion on this critically important topic.  So I'll yield back the balance of my time.  I now recognize the ranking member, the representative from Michigan for her opening statement.