H.R. 875, the Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act; H.R. 176, the No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act; H.R. 1071, the No Censors on our Shores Act; and Adoption of the 119th Congress Authorization and Oversight Plan

Committee on the Judiciary

2025-02-26

Loading video...

Source: Congress.gov

Summary

This detailed transcript captures a comprehensive markup session of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, focusing on several key legislative and oversight elements. The session covers the debate and amendment process on civil rights legislation, including a measure to address racial discrimination in housing and employment, followed by an in-depth examination of law enforcement oversight, particularly concerning January 6th Capitol insurrectionists. The discussion includes significant debate on the constitutional and ethical responsibilities of Congress in overseeing the executive's pardon power and ensuring accountability for violent acts against law enforcement. The markup session concludes with the formal adoption of the committee's overall oversight plan, incorporating multiple proposed amendments related to governmental ethics, constitutional integrity, and public safety, with a record of final voting results reflecting a bipartisan yet contested outcome. Throughout the session, the committee navigates complex and sensitive issues that touch on constitutional principles, criminal justice reform, and the balance of power among the three branches of government.

Participants

Transcript

It's your right.   absolutely you can and and and if you want to shut down x meta google any of them you want but don't expect to come to america under a u.s visa don't expect to be in america and remain if in fact you are the perpetrator of that extinguishing of free speech in short   We're not going beyond the water's edge.  We do nothing to people abroad.  But when you come on our shores, we stand united for the First Amendment.  For that reason, this legislation very simply says that in fact, denying the ability to remain here or to come here of someone who has participated in stifling free speech will in fact be the policy of our nation.  For that reason,   I want people to understand, it's not whose speech was denied, it's that an American speech or an American organization's speech was denied.  We seek in no way   to influence someone's overseas activity other than to say, we do export our belief in free access of all.  As a matter of fact, I just came back from the Middle East, where one of our greatest exports today is in fact helping Iranian dissidents circumvent the censorship that goes on in Iran so that there can be communication of those who object to that totalitarian regime.   Would we cave to that?  No.  And we should not cave to somebody simply because they say they're a democracy while, in fact, being a democracy except when it comes to American free speech.  With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.  Chairman Yields back.  Chair Naum recognizes the ranking member for an opening statement.