Hearings to examine the nominations of Matthew Lohmeier, of Arizona, to be Under Secretary of the Air Force, Justin Overbaugh, of Florida, to be a Deputy Under Secretary, and Daniel Zimmerman, of North Carolina, to be an Assistant Secretary, all of the Department of Defense.
2025-05-01
Summary
This hearing was held to consider the nominations of Matthew Lohmeyer to be Undersecretary of the Air Force, Justin Overbaugh to be Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, and Daniel Zimmerman to be Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs[ 00:29:16-00:30:50 ] . Each nominee presented their qualifications and priorities for their respective roles, while committee members raised questions about their experience, policy stances, and past statements.
Themes
Nomination of Matthew Lohmeyer and Controversies
Matthew Lohmeyer, nominated for Undersecretary of the Air Force, highlighted his extensive experience in both the Air and Space Forces, emphasizing the importance of readiness and national security against threats, particularly from China. He discussed his past experience in China and with F-15C operations, underscoring the need for strong air and space capabilities. However, senators expressed significant concerns regarding his past conduct, including publishing a book and making social media posts that were characterized as extreme partisanship and animosity towards military members with differing political views. Specific issues raised included his characterization of the January 6th attack and his views on politicization within the military. Lohmeyer defended his statements as being made in a private capacity and committed to fostering an apolitical military workplace focused on accountability and high standards if confirmed. Questions also arose about his managerial experience for such a large department and his past comments on the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Senator Ernst pressed Lohmeyer on a long-standing commitment to upgrade a runway at the Iowa Air National Guard facility, seeking a firm commitment he was reluctant to give directly but promised transparency and serious consideration.
Nomination of Justin Overbaugh
Justin Overbaugh, nominated for Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, emphasized his 25 years of intelligence and special operations experience. His priorities include strategic assessments, fostering innovation, and delivering actionable intelligence to warfighters. He committed to working with Congress to improve the governance of the defense intelligence enterprise, ensure better coordination among agencies, and respond to evolving threats in cyber, AI, and space[ 01:03:30-01:03:56 ] [ 01:14:23-01:15:46 ] . Senator King also highlighted the importance of intelligence officials telling the truth to leadership, which Overbaugh affirmed as crucial.
Nomination of Daniel Zimmerman
Daniel Zimmerman, nominated for Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs, highlighted his nearly two decades of national security experience across the CIA, White House, and Senate. His priorities include cultivating strong partnerships, addressing persistent threats from Russia, Iran, and terrorism, and countering China's influence globally. He discussed the need for NATO allies to increase burden-sharing and for efficient foreign military sales processes to support allies effectively.
Key Policy Discussions
Several policy areas were discussed across the nominations. The politicization of the military, particularly related to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives and concerns about retribution against personnel, was a prominent theme in Lohmeyer's questioning. The operational value of the Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) program was debated, with Senator Shaheen expressing concern over its potential discontinuation by the current administration. Defense spending and modernization efforts, including the B-21 bomber and Sentinel programs, were addressed, with concerns about funding and management. Senators also raised specific infrastructure and basing concerns in their states, seeking commitments from nominees to address these issues.
Tone of the Meeting
The tone of the meeting was largely professional, but with moments of pointed and challenging questioning, particularly directed at Matthew Lohmeyer due to his controversial past statements and writings. Senators pressed for direct answers on issues such as the January 6th attack and the Russia-Ukraine conflict, often expressing frustration with Lohmeyer's nuanced responses. There was a clear divide in the committee regarding Lohmeyer's suitability for the role, reflecting partisan differences. The other nominees, Justin Overbaugh and Daniel Zimmerman, faced less confrontational questioning and generally received positive feedback for their experience and clarity. Overall, nominees maintained a respectful demeanor and expressed gratitude for the opportunity to serve.
Participants
Transcript
Sign up for free to see the full transcript
Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.