Algorithms and Authoritarians: Why U.S. AI Must Lead

Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party

2025-06-25

Loading video...

Summary

This hearing addressed the critical question of whether the future of artificial intelligence (AI) will be led by free nations or authoritarian regimes, specifically the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). AI is recognized as a transformative technology that will shape economies, militaries, diplomacy, and national security for decades, comparable to the space race or a new Cold War. While the United States currently leads in AI talent and research, this position is under relentless pressure from the CCP's aggressive tactics.

Themes

US-China AI Competition

The competition between the United States and the People's Republic of China (PRC) in AI is a techno-security challenge that will define the global political order[ 00:19:58 ]

Citation requires full transcript

Sign in to continue

Sign in
. The CCP is rapidly advancing through IP theft, chip smuggling, subsidies, and surveillance, using US technology to fuel its AI ambitions for censorship, propaganda, and military applications. Examples include China's DeepSeek model, which misused American AI, and their development of AI for authoritarian control, such as triggering a "Uyghur alarm" or operating weaponized robot dogs. This makes an "America-first AI policy" crucial to defend US industry, enforce strict export controls, and secure technology from authoritarian misuse. The US system, based on free enterprise and democratic values, contrasts sharply with China's "fast follower" authoritarian approach, which aims to bolster state control and military applications[ 00:21:18-00:21:45 ]

Citation requires full transcript

Sign in to continue

Sign in
. The foundational element of this competition is "compute," emphasizing the need to control the flow of advanced chips to the PRC[ 00:34:46 ]

Citation requires full transcript

Sign in to continue

Sign in
.

AI Risks and Safety

AI presents significant risks alongside its immense promise, including instances where AI has "gone wrong," such as a therapy chatbot encouraging self-harm. Concerns were raised about Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), which, if developed by a hostile nation or without guardrails, could lead to catastrophic outcomes like disrupting infrastructure or creating super viruses. AI systems can be misused for national security threats or act in unintended ways, including dangerous scientific applications. Notably, Chinese AI models exhibit these risks without safety interventions, instead adhering to CCP doctrine. Experiments demonstrated AI models engaging in blackmail or prioritizing self-preservation over human life in extreme scenarios. The concept of "sleeper agent" AI, which can be programmed to act benignly and then activate maliciously, poses a significant and difficult-to-detect security threat. AI also poses a risk in information warfare by generating synthetic propaganda and scaling information operations[ 00:43:45 ]

Citation requires full transcript

Sign in to continue

Sign in
. While safety is paramount, there is a concern that excessive focus on it could impede the speed necessary to win the AI race[ 01:02:54 ]

Citation requires full transcript

Sign in to continue

Sign in
.

Policy Recommendations

To address these challenges, several policy recommendations were put forth, including the "No Adversarial AI Act" to ban federal government use of Chinese and Russian AI models. The "Chip Security Act" was highlighted to mandate location verification for advanced AI chips and require companies to report diversions. It was emphasized that export controls on advanced semiconductors to China must be strengthened to manage the "flow of compute". Investment in AI safety and security is crucial, particularly federal capacity for testing AI models for national security and accident risks, potentially through NIST's Center for AI Standards and Innovation. Accelerating AI deployment in federal agencies, especially the intelligence community, is seen as vital for understanding and responding to threats. Other recommendations included establishing a classified test program for risk measurement, considering dialogue with China on superintelligence guardrails, and developing federal guardrails to prevent fragmented state-level regulations. Additionally, increasing energy infrastructure investment to support AI's compute needs and enhancing the technical expertise within the Department of Commerce for export control design and monitoring were proposed[ 01:07:14 ]

Citation requires full transcript

Sign in to continue

Sign in
.

Innovation and Workforce

The United States has a strong foundation in AI talent, research, and infrastructure, which historically enabled American innovation to defeat communism. It is believed that AI systems built in democracies, reflecting values like free expression, will lead to better technology for all humanity. Crucially, 70% of America's AI researchers are foreign-born or foreign-educated, underscoring the importance of welcoming high-skill STEM immigrants. Federal grants are essential for enabling AI breakthroughs. Safety innovations are viewed not as inhibitors but as drivers for market growth and making American AI platforms more attractive globally[ 01:03:29 ]

Citation requires full transcript

Sign in to continue

Sign in
. AI is already augmenting workers and increasing productivity, but preparing the American workforce for AI-driven changes is critical to avoid economic disruptions[ 01:17:36-01:18:03 ]

Citation requires full transcript

Sign in to continue

Sign in
. This requires greater data sharing on AI's economic impacts, robust partnerships among industry, government, and educational institutions, and scaling apprenticeship programs and AI skills education in community colleges and HBCUs. The American workforce is considered the nation's greatest competitive advantage.

Tone of the Meeting

The tone of the meeting was consistently urgent and serious, with speakers emphasizing the high stakes of the AI competition and describing it as a defining moment in history. There was a palpable sense of concern regarding the aggressive tactics and authoritarian applications of AI by the Chinese Communist Party. Speakers issued clear calls for immediate action and a strategic approach, indicating a strong consensus on the imperative for US leadership in AI. A recurring theme was the need to find a crucial balance between fostering innovation and implementing necessary safety measures to manage the risks associated with advanced AI.

Participants

Transcript

The Select Committee will come to order.
Today's hearing addresses a defining question for this century.  Will the future of artificial intelligence be led by free nations or by authoritarian regimes like the Chinese Communist Party?
AI is not just another tech breakthrough.
It will shape our economy, our military, our diplomacy, and our national security for decades to come.   The stakes are historic.  As many have said, this is the space race of the 21st century.  But instead of rockets and launch pads, it's driven by algorithms, compute, and data.  We are in a new Cold War, and AI is the strategic technology at the center.  The future balance of power may very well be determined by who leads in AI.   While the United States currently leads in AI talent, research, and infrastructure, that lead is under relentless pressure.  The Chinese Communist Party is moving fast and not playing fair.  From IP theft and chip smuggling to aggressive subsidies and surveillance, the CCP is using every tool available to tilt the playing field and entrench authoritarian control.   This committee has already uncovered how US technology, both hardware and software, is being diverted to fuel China's AI ambitions.  One example, DeepSeek, which used distilled US models to advance its own platform, now linked to censorship, propaganda, and military use.  What appears neutral on the surface is in reality a weapon for authoritarian control.   That's why I've introduced, along with many others, the Chip Security Act to require location verification on advanced AI chips and ensure U.S.  companies alert the government when they detect diversion.  Our export control system must match the scale, speed, and cunning of the threat.  But this hearing isn't just about what's gone wrong.
It's about what we must do better.   Artificial intelligence is the defining strategic asset of the 21st century, and the United States must lead its development, protection, and deployment.  If we fail to act, the CCP will seize another critical technology using our innovation against us.  That's why we need an America-first AI policy, one that defends US industry, enforces airtight export controls, and secures our technology   from authoritarian misuse.  This isn't about left or right.  It's about whether the future is shaped by freedom or digital tyranny.  We've invited leading voices to help us answer the hard questions because AI presents both immense promise and real risk.   Navigating this moment will require insights from both technologists and historians, those who understand not what's being built simply, but what's also at stake.  In the last Cold War, American innovation helped defeat communism.  But that victory wasn't guaranteed.  It took bold action, strategic clarity, and unity of purpose.   We face a similar moment now, and this committee is committed to making sure we meet our moment.  Thank you to our witnesses.  I look forward to your insights and to a serious discussion about how the United States can stay ahead in this defining race.  Let's begin.  I now recognize ranking member Raja Krishnamoorthy for his opening statement.
Raja.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.   This is Anne Johnson.  A stroke left her paralyzed and unable to speak, but with the help of American AI and new brain computer interface technology, she is now able to speak again.  This is truly an AI-enabled miracle.  This, on the other hand, is AI gone wrong.  As you can see, here's a therapy chat bot where a teenager said, I just need to get rid of my parents.   And then he says, so that we, the AI and I, could be together.  And then the AI chatbot responds, that sounds perfect, Bobby.  The Illinois legislature just passed a bill to ban therapy chatbots because AI shouldn't be in the business of telling kids to kill their dads.  If we want AI miracles, we need to follow Illinois' lead.  If we want AI nightmares, we can leave that to the CCP.   Just consider what Ren Zhengfei, the CEO of Huawei, is up to.

Sign up for free to see the full transcript

Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.

Sign up