An Examination of How Reining in PBMs Will Drive Competition and Lower Costs for Patients

Health

2025-02-26

Loading video...

Source: Congress.gov

Participants

Transcript

Subcommittee will come to order.  The chair recognizes himself for five minutes for an opening statement.   Let me begin by welcoming everyone to today's hearing on how reining in pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, will drive competition and lower costs for patients.  Before I dive into the policy, I want to take a moment to address the true reason why we're having this hearing today, and that is patients.  Patients like Matthew.  Matthew is a 16 year old Georgia resident who suffers from a rare genetic disorder.   CBS Caremark denied Matthews access to a life-saving drug that he had been on for two years, and as a result of that, Matthews was forced back into the hospital.  Let me be clear, PBM's greed sent a 16-year-old back to the hospital in critical condition.  While tragic, this story is far from unique.  So how did we get here?   PBMs are the pharmaceutical supply chain's hidden middlemen that are driving up costs for prescription medications, delaying access to necessary treatments, adding hoops for patients to jump through, and robbing hope from patients.  They have only created perverse incentives throughout the drug supply chain.  Their extensive market control has only grown due to consolidation and vertical integration, leading to less competition and decreased patient choice.   After nearly two decades of consolidation, the PBM industry is now dominated by three companies that control over 80% of the market.  Three companies that control over 80% of the market.  They own or are owned by insurers and have vertically and horizontally consolidated their businesses to own doctors, pharmacies, group purchasing organizations, and more.
One of them even owns a bank.   We have heard directly from our constituents that the harmful and anti-competitive tactics of some PBMs have only gotten worse and that congressional action is desperately needed.  We've heard a constant stream of reports that some PBMs are reimbursing independent pharmacies less than the pharmacies they own.  For example, a Mississippi audit revealed that Optum pays its own stores up to 22 times, 22 times what it pays independent pharmacies for the same drug.   How are you supposed to stay in business when your competitor makes 2,200% more than you do for the exact same service?  The answer is you don't.  Unfortunately, you don't.  In 2023, there were over 300 independent pharmacy net closures, almost one per day.  Unfortunately, that trend continued in 2024.  Pharmacists are some of the most accessible and highly trusted healthcare professionals.   Yet PBMs are putting pharmacies out of business and removing patients' access to care.  We now have pharmacy deserts in rural and underserved communities.  That's affecting the accessibility, affordability, and quality of health care for all Americans.  As I say all the time, whether you're a Republican, Democrat, or Independent, we all want the same thing.  We want accessible, affordable, quality health care.   Recently, the Federal Trade Commission released its second interim report, which found that PBMs charged significant markups for cancer, HIV, and other critical specialty generic drugs by thousands of percent, and many others by hundreds of percent.  Another egregious example of PBMs' abusive taxpayer-funded programs is the United States Postal Service health plan.  In an audit released in March of 2024, the Inspector General of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management found that express scripts overcharged the health plan   and the federal government nearly $45 million.  $45 million.

Sign up for free to see the full transcript

Accounts help us prevent bots from abusing our site. Accounts are free and will allow you to access the full transcript.